UntitledNBA Accreditation and Teaching and learning in Engineering (NATE) form

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Assignment -4 Week -4

Email *

A well-written course outcome will have these features *

1 point

Can be measured by an assignment, test, project, or examination

Never begins with vague verbs such as ‘know’ and ‘appreciate’

Is free of ambiguous words and phrases, acronyms and industry specific jargon

All of these

Common Errors in Writing Learning Outcomes
*

1 point

not observable

dependent on the way the material is taught

dependent on the context in which it is taught

too specific

All of these

All COs of a course should have the number of classroom sessions.
*

1 point

True

False

Identify two Dos from the following in writing COs
*

1 point

Make the CO as general as possible

Use at least two action verbs with each CO

Make the CO statements as detailed as possible and measurable

Do not use words including ‘like’, ‘such as’, ‘different’, ‘various’ ‘etc.’ with respect to knowledge elements.

Required

Why should a CO be tagged with the number of class sessions?
*

1 point

The number of class sessions for all COs should add up to the number of hours available for the course in a semester

It helps in planning the instruction for the CO

It helps the teacher to know the number of lectures he/she has to deliver

It helps in understanding the scope of the CO and the strength to which the related POs are addressed

Which one of the following statements is true regarding tagging a CO with Knowledge Categories?
*

1 point

A CO statement should always include elements from the category of Factual Knowledge.

CO statement itself may not explicitly indicate all the concerned knowledge categories

A CO statement does not include any categories of knowledge.

A CO statement will always include two categories of knowledge

How is direct attainment of COs computed?
*

1 point

Through the performance of students in CIE

Through the performance of students in CIE and SEE

Through the performance of students in SEE

Through the semester end student surveys

The two criteria that need to be considered in setting CO attainment targets are
*

1 point

Targets should be set for each student based on his/her previous performance

The attainment gap should enable the teacher to plan for improvement of instruction for each CO

Different targets are necessary for different groups of students

The CO attainment computations can be automated

Required

For any activity to be considered for computing the attainment of POs/PSOs
*

1 point

Performance of all students in semester end examinations

All students of a program are required to participate.

Performance in all core courses and electives

Performance in some of the extra-curricular activities

Is it necessary to set the targets for all POs at similar levels?
*

1 point

Yes, it is necessary to get accredited by NBA

Yes, all POs need not be addressed to the same level

No, as no program can address all POs equally

Yes, it is possible to address all POs equally with effort

Source : NPTEL

Submit

Clear form

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Forms