ACL 2017 Post-conference Survey
General Questions
Did you attend ACL 2017 in Vancouver?
Did you present a paper at the main conference?
How satisfied were you with these aspects of ACL 2017?
You can leave a row blank if it is not applicable to you (for instance, if you didn't attend a tutorial or the workshops).
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
The overall conference experience
The quality of the scientific program
The poster sessions
The food provided at the conference
The social event at the aquarium
The tutorials
The workshops
The invited talks and lifetime achievement award talk
The ACL presidential address
The quality of the reviewing for the conference
What was your favorite part of the conference?
Your answer
What was your least favorite part?
Your answer
Any suggestions on how to improve future conferences?
Your answer
The conference fostered an atmosphere of open discussion that I felt welcome to participate in.
If you would like to elaborate on your evaluation of the conference atmosphere, please do so here
Your answer
This year we offered on-site subsidized childcare for the first time. Should we try to offer childcare at future conferences?
If we offer childcare at NAACL 2018 in New Orleans, Louisiana, will you use it?
If we offer childcare at ACL 2018 in Melbourne, Australia, will you use it?
If you would like to be notified once we decide whether to offer childcare, please enter your email address here.
Your answer
Do you have any comments about childcare at ACL conferences?
Your answer
Navigating the conference program
Which of the following did you use?
You can choose more than one answer.
Which of the following did you like best?
Please pick one.
Did you know that the program page on allowed you to generate a custom PDF with your personalized schedule?
Both the app and the handbook cost money. If it came down to a choice between the two, which would you choose for future conferences?
Any suggestions on how to improve the website, the app, or the printed handbook?
Your answer
Did you review for ACL 2017?
Did you sign up for the Toronto paper matching system to help improve the papers that you were assigned to review?
If you didn't sign up, you can sign up at for future conferences. It takes less than 5 minutes to register and point it at your publications page or your Google Scholar profile.
As a reviewer, how satisfied were you with the following parts of the reviewing process?
Very dissatisfied
Very satisfied
The amount of time allocated to reviewing
The amount of time allocated to discussion and addressing authors' responses
The communication about the reviewing schedule
Any suggestions on how to improve reviewing?
Your answer
Women and Underrepresented Minorities in NLP workshop
This year held the first Women and Underrepresented Minorities in NLP workshop. If you'd like to be involved with future workshops, you can sign up for the group's mailing list by emailing with the word "subscribe" in the body or subject line.
Did you attend the WiNLP Workshop?
What did you think of the WiNLP Workshop?
Your answer
Other questions
Should we have a session at ACL with one-minute poster previews to showcase posters?
Do you have any suggestions on how to give more visibility to poster presentations, if you feel it is necessary?
Your answer
Do you think any of these options are worth doing in order to increase the number of oral presentations?
Would you like to be contacted about volunteer opportunities within the ACL organization?
To improve discoverability of papers in the ACL Anthology would you be willing to tag the final versions of your papers with any of this metadata?
Did you like the full conference breakfasts?
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service