SourceCred attribution feedback
All questions are optional. All responses are anonymous unless you tell us who you are, and will be kept private to the SourceCred maintainers.
What repository are you providing feedback for?
How familiar are you with the above project?
I'm a primary maintainer
I'm a regular contributor
I'm a user and/or have contributed occasionally
In your estimation, who *should* be the top ~10 contributors?
What did the cred attribution get wrong?
(e.g.: "this person was ranked highly, but mostly just bikesheds in discussions", or "this contribution was critically important but undervalued")
What did the cred attribution get right?
(e.g., any interesting insights that you hadn't realized previously?)
If possible, can you provide the version string in the bottom-right of the SourceCred website that you're using?
It looks something like "(v0.1.0-508fbc5d7251-20180906-1906-clean-production) v0.1.0".
Anything else you'd like to add?
(e.g., feature suggestions, usability feedback, your favorite color)
Optional: What is your GitHub handle?
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Terms of Service