SourceCred attribution feedback
All questions are optional. All responses are anonymous unless you tell us who you are, and will be kept private to the SourceCred maintainers.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
What repository are you providing feedback for?
(e.g.: torvalds/linux)
How familiar are you with the above project?
Clear selection
In your estimation, who *should* be the top ~10 contributors?
If you can't think of 10, just list as many as you can
On a scale of 0 to 10, how well does SourceCred reflect your understanding of the repo
0 = totally unrealistic, 10 = OMG get out of my head!
Clear selection
What did the cred attribution get wrong?
(e.g.: "this person was ranked highly, but mostly just bikesheds in discussions", or "this contribution was critically important but undervalued")
What did the cred attribution get right?
(e.g., any interesting insights that you hadn't realized previously?)
If possible, can you provide the version string in the bottom-right of the SourceCred website that you're using?
It looks something like "(v0.1.0-508fbc5d7251-20180906-1906-clean-production) v0.1.0".
Anything else you'd like to add?
(e.g., feature suggestions, usability feedback, your favorite color)
Optional: What is your GitHub handle?
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy