Accreditation of Media Personnel - Questionnaire for General Public
The Delhi High Court has constituted a committee under the Chairpersonship of Justice (Retd.) Ruma Pal on the subject 'Media reporting in courts – balancing free press, fair trial and integrity of judicial proceedings.' The Committee will explore the ideal balance between the freedom of the press and the administration of justice, which are both key constitutional values. To this end, the Committee seeks the opinion of various stakeholders on formulating guidelines for accreditation of media personnel reporting from the Delhi High Court and other lower courts in Delhi.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Untitled Title
1. Should accreditation be mandatory to report pending court proceedings? *
Accreditation is a process by which an authority requires a person to meet certain standards/qualifications before they are permitted to carry out some activity. (If your answer is 'NO', please go to Question 8)
2. For what kind of reporting should accreditation be required?
Reporting means publication by print, electronic or television media. (Select all that apply)
3. What qualifications/experience must be met for receiving accreditation?
(Select all that apply)
4. What should be the duration for which accreditation is granted?
Clear selection
5. What benefits should accreditation provide?
(Select all that apply)
6. Should there be a separate seating arrangement for accredited reporters?
(Select all that apply)
7. What should be the penalty for mis-reporting by an accredited person?
No Penalty
Warning
Temporary suspension of accreditation
Permanent withdrawal of accreditation
Financial penalty on the reporter/media organisation
Minor mis-reporting
Major mis-reporting
Next
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy