Medicine 2.0'14 Maui Evaluation Form
All questions are optional - leave questions which are not applicable or which you don't want to answer blank
1. How would you rate the following items on a scale of 1-10?
Please rate the PEER REVIEWED PROGRAM on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Authors only: Please rate the quality of the PEER REVIEW COMMENTS you received (if any) on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Please rate the opening KEYNOTE OF Elad Yom-Tov on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Please rate the closing KEYNOTE of Gary Kreps on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Please rate the VENUE on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Please rate CATERING on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Please rate the WELCOME RECEPTION on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Please rate the WEBSITE on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Please rate the GENERAL ORGANISATION on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Please rate overall VALUE FOR MONEY on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
2. General Comments
Remarks on your ratings, if any
Your answer
What did you learn or get out from this congress? (e.g., did it generate any new ideas or contacts?)
Your answer
What did you like most about the congress? (what should we keep in future congresses?)
Your answer
What did you dislike about the congress, what would you change for the next congress?
Your answer
3. Next med2 meetings
Likelihood to attend a future med2?
How likely is it that you attend a future med2?
Should we require submission of a 5-page paper for oral presentations instead of an abstract?
For future med2 conferences, in order to raise the quality of oral presentations, we are considering to require submission of a 5-page paper instead of a short abstract to be eligible for a full oral presentation (abstracts are sufficient for a poster presentation). Do you think this is a good idea even if it means less oral presentations and more work for reviewers and presenters?
Do you prefer to have two med2 conferences each year (one in Europe and one elsewhere), or do you prefer a single larger one
E.g. two smaller conferences with 200 participants, rather than one with 500 participants?
If we were to organize two conferences in 2015, would you...
What kind of venue do you prefer?
Do you prefer the meeting over the weekend or weekdays?
If we offer additional tutorials/courses (1hr, 4hr) before/after Medicine 2.0, what would you like to learn about
Also mention specific instructors if you have some in mind, or if you yourself would be able to teach a course, state your name and say that you would be able to teach
Your answer
Possible/Preferred venue for 2015
Which of the following venues would attract you most?
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service