RAUF DENKTAS UNIVERSITY STUDENT EVALUATION OF THE COURSE AND TEACHING
Instructions:
• This evaluation is part of our continuous effort to maintain academic and administrative quality.
• Please note that the results of this evaluation will be available to the instructor only AFTER final course grades have been submitted.
• We take your answers seriously, and we hope you will also take this survey seriously.
• Please write comments to explain your scores.

Thank you for participating in this evaluation.
Student Demographic Information
Sex
Country
A. Course evaluation - ENGL002 Elemantary English
*
A
B
C
D
F
Course outline matches course objectives and requirements of the course
Course outline is strictly followed
All topics indicated in the course outline are covered
Methods of evaluation (e.g. assignments, tests, etc.) reflects the subject matter
Instructional materials (readings, audio-visual materials, etc.) help learning
Instructional activities (lectures, labs, tutorials, etc.) help learning
Level of difficulty of the course material is reasonable
Volume of the work required in the course is reasonable
The value of the overall learning experience was…
B. The instructor: Hüseyin Demirel
*
A
B
C
D
F
Follows the plan for the course as written in the course outline
Explains the grading system clearly, i.e. weights and content of each assessment
Explains the aims of each topic before lecturing
Is accessible to students out of class during office hours
Speaks in a manner that is easy to understand
Encourages students to ask questions
Comes to class in time (not late)
Does not leave the class early, i.e. uses all the time
Is always prepared for the lesson s/he teachesGoes over the points again to ensure that students understand the lesson
Goes over the points again to ensure that students understand the lesson
Gives examinations that cover the topics lectured in class
Evaluates exams and assignments and returns them in time
Gives assignments and exams that are reasonable in length and difficulty
Grades exam papers, homework and projects fairly and impartially
The overall effectiveness of the instructor was…
Comments
1. What do you like best about this course?
Your answer
2. What would you like to change about the course?
Your answer
3. What are the instructor's strengths (good aspects)?
Your answer
4. What suggestions do you have to improve the instructor's teaching?
Your answer
5. Other comments *
Your answer
C. Course Learning Outcomes (knowledge, skills and competences expected to be achieved at the end of the semester).
*
A
B
C
D
F
Listening: I can recognise familiar words and very basic phrases concerning myself, my family and immediate concrete surroundings when people speak slowly and clearly
Reading: I can understand familiar names, words and very simple sentences, for example on notices and posters or in catalogues.
Spoken Interaction: I can interact in a simple way provided the other person is prepared to repeat or rephrase things at a slower rate of speech and help me formulate what I'm trying to say. I can ask and answer simple questions in areas of immediate need or on very familiar topics.
Spoken Production: I can use simple phrases and sentences to describe where I live and people I know.
Writing: I can write a short, simple postcard, for example sending holiday greetings. I can fill in forms with personal details, for example entering my name, nationality and address on a hotel registration form.
D. Self-Reflection
*
A
B
C
D
F
My attendance
My level of English to follow the course
My current Grade Point Average (GPA)
My expected grade in this course
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Rauf Denktas University. Report Abuse - Terms of Service