Read the passage from Martinez (2018) and decide whether the texts that follow constitute plagiarism of that original work.
Your answer
Martinez (2018, p.41) extract
According to Martinez (2018), although there is some anecdotal/case-study evidence that would support the notion that non-natives are stigmatized, it is difficult to establish any direct causal effect between non-native forms and rejection. *
5 points
As mentioned by Martinez (2018), there is a lack of concrete evidence proving that editors prefer native speaker manuscripts, and, moreover, it is difficult to show a "direct causal effect between non-native English forms and the rejection of an article" (p. 41)." *
5 points
As mentioned by Martinez (2018), it is difficult to show a link between being a non-native speaker and article rejection, since it is nearly impossible to "disentangle" language from a broad spectrum of other common contributing factors. *
5 points
There is some anecdotal evidence (e.g. Flowerdew & Wang, 2016; Hewings, 2006) that editors notice when writer is a non-native of English, yet it is difficult to establish any sort of causal link between that noticing and a whole array of other contributing factors (e.g. Ahlstrom, 2012, Sullivan, 2002). *
5 points
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service