ICML 2026 Review Policy Poll

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

ICML 2026 Review Policy Poll

This is an informal anonymous community poll about ICML 2026 review outcomes under different LLM review policies: https://icml.cc/Conferences/2026/LLM-Policy.

The goal is only to get a rough snapshot of whether people observed any difference in scores or review style between Policy A and Policy B.

Please do NOT include identifying details such as:
- paper title
- author names
- institution
- exact topic if it is very niche
- unique method names

This is not a rigorous study and results will be noisy and self-selected.

Do this if you can for your own papers and the ones you reviewed.

Which review policy was your paper under? *

Policy A (Conservative): Use of LLMs for reviewing is strictly prohibited.

Policy B (Permissive): Allowed: Use of LLMs to help understand the paper and related works, and polish reviews. Submissions can be fed to privacy-compliant* LLMs.

What was the average score received for this paper? *

What score vector did this paper receive?
Example: 6, 5, 5 or 4, 4, 3, 3
Please enter only the numeric scores, separated by commas.

What was the average confidence for this paper?

Relative to your own expectation, the scores felt:

Much harsher than expected

Slightly harsher than expected

About as expected

Slightly more lenient than expected

Much more lenient than expected

Clear selection

Did the reviews feel especially polished

Yes

Somewhat

Clear selection

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Forms