PREFORMA IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE
In Google anmelden, um den Fortschritt zu speichern. Weitere Informationen
SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION OF THE RESPONDING PARTY
Name of the institution/organisation *
Contact person *
E-mail *
Date of compilation *
Datum
SECTION 2: BENEFITS THAT PREFORMA CAN PROVIDE TO YOUR INSTITUTION/ORGANISATION
In which sector does your institution/organisation operate? *
How did you learn about the PREFORMA project? *
Which are the needs that brought your institution/organisation to join the PREFORMA project/community? *
How do you expect the PREFORMA’s results will impact on the workflow of your institution/organisation? *
Which are the main benefits that you gained so far from the experience within the PREFORMA project/community and its network of partners? *
Did PREFORMA contribute to increase the reputation and relevance of your institutions/organisation in your target community, and in particular in the community of (digital) cultural heritage? Please explain why. *
SECTION 3: THE PREFORMA OUTCOMES
Which is your opinion on the quality of the information provided in the project’s delivery channels, namely: PREFORMA website and blog, software released and information available in the Open Source Portal and in the suppliers’ repositories, and demonstrations delivered at the project’s public events? *
Very poor
Poor
Don't know
Good
Very good
PREFORMA website and blog (www.preforma-project.eu)
Open Source Portal (www.preforma-project.eu/open-source-portal.html)
veraPDF website & GitHub (http://verapdf.org/, https://github.com/verapdf)
DPF Manager website & GitHub (http://dpfmanager.org/, https://github.com/EasyinnovaSL/DPFManager)
MediaConch website & GitHub (https://mediaarea.net/MediaConch/, https://github.com/MediaArea/MediaConch_SourceCode/)
Presentations and demos at public events (www.preforma-project.eu/events.html)
Please, indicate which of the three media types covered in PREFORMA you are interested in. *
Pflichtfrage
Is there any other file format for which you would be interested in having a conformance checker, besides those already covered in PREFORMA (PDF/A, TIFF, Matroska/FFv1)?
Which is your assessment of the quality and value of the veraPDF project?
Very poor
Poor
Don't know
Good
Very good
Innovation potential
Performance / Precision
Usability
Support / Documentation
Scalability / Extensibility
Interoperability
OS work practices
Commercial feasibility
Auswahl löschen
Which is your assessment of the quality and value of the DPF Manager project?
Very poor
Poor
Don't know
Good
Very good
Innovation potential
Performance / Precision
Usability
Support / Documentation
Scalability / Extensibility
Interoperability
OS work practices
Commercial feasibility
Auswahl löschen
Which is your assessment of the quality and value of the MediaConch project?
Very poor
Poor
Don't know
Good
Very good
Innovation potential
Performance / Precision
Usability
Support / Documentation
Scalability / Extensibility
Interoperability
OS work practices
Commercial feasibility
Auswahl löschen
Which are in your opinion the main strengths and weaknesses of the three open source projects?
Did you participate in the evaluation of the software? How many users did you recruited? Please, describe the categories of users that you involved.
Are the software developed meeting your specific requirements/needs? If not, what is still missing?
Are you using or planning to use the results of the open source projects in your legacy environment and/or in your digital archiving and preservation initiatives?
Auswahl löschen
Did you already make any experiment or proof of concept? Please describe it.
SECTION 4: PLANS FOR THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE PREFORMA OUTCOMES
Do you think that there is a value in keeping alive the PREFORMA network beyond the end of the project? Please explain why. *
Do you think that the PREFORMA network will or can provide benefits to your organisation/institution, after the end of the EC funded period? How? *
Will your organisation/institution participate in the activities of the open source community after the end of the EC funded project? How? *
Perception of PREFORMA outcomes so far. On the basis of the information/material available, please indicate which are the most interesting outcomes produced by the project, i.e. those that are expected to deliver a stronger impact on your business/activities. *
Not relevant
Little relevant
Don't know
Relevant
Very relevant
veraPDF checker
DPF Manager
MediaConch
Shell / Interoperability API
PREFORMA Challenge Brief
Standardisation activity
Test files and test cases
Open source practices
Web portal
PREFORMA community
Organisation of relevant events / workshops / initiatives / WGs
Experience in joint PCP
Ranking your interest in future developments. For each outcome that you plan to exploit, please describe which are the plans to leverage on and sustain it in your organisation/institution. (e.g. re-use for your corporate activities, re-packaging for the creation of new products, offering a service layer on the open products, etc.).
Which is in your opinion the best approach for the exploitation of the results achieved in PREFORMA? *
Do you have any other comment / suggestion / idea that you feel it is worth to take into account when planning the sustainability and future exploitation of the PREFORMA outcomes?
SECTION 5: LESSONS LEARNT (RESERVED TO THE PREFORMA PARTNERS)
Please list the significant lessons that you learned during the various phases of the project and their possible impact on the exploitation plan.
Phase 1. Preparation of the tender (e.g. legal issues, market analysis, collection of requirements, description of the challenge brief, timing of the tender procedure, evaluation of the proposals, etc.)
Phase 2. Design phase (e.g. evaluation of the results submitted by the suppliers, completeness of the documentation, clarity of the presentations, communication with the suppliers, etc.)
Phase 3. Prototyping phase (e.g. monitoring, planning of the releases, testing and evaluation of the prototypes, feedback, training, etc.)
Phase 4. Testing phase (e.g. definition of the test classes, preparation of the corpora of test files, definition of the evaluation framework and methodology, etc.)
Phase 5. Public events (e.g. format, duration, quality of the speeches, locations, etc.)
Phase 6. Website and online communication (e.g. quality of the information provided, updates, interactivity with the audiences, targeted messages, etc.)
Senden
Alle Eingaben löschen
Geben Sie niemals Passwörter über Google Formulare weiter.
GoogleGoogle Formulare
Dieser Inhalt wurde nicht von Google erstellt und wird von Google auch nicht unterstützt.