MS PF PEER JUDGE Comments Form

Please complete this form during class right after the debate has happened. If you can't get it done in class--complete it shortly after class.

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Peer Judge's First and Last Name (that's you!) *
Your Email Address (used to send you comments about your ballot)
Pro Team NAMES (e.g. Anika-Vinny) *
Con Team NAMES (e.g. Michael-Jenny) *
Mark the side in this debate that you believe Won: *
READ THIS FOR TYPING YOUR REASON FOR DECISION
NO: Had more reasons.

NO: Gave better analysis. Gave better refutation.

REFER TO SPECIFIC TOPIC ARGUMENTS FOR YOUR DECISION.

YES: Pro wins better access for people with serious illnesses who need drugs--by having price caps. Con tried to say price caps reduce development of new drugs. Pro showed the caps would just stop high profits-not new drugs-and even if fewer drugs are developed--at least they are affordable.

Main REASON FOR YOUR DECISION (----TYPE the winning team's TOPIC SPECIFIC arguments that persuaded you and ----TYPE which TOPIC SPECIFIC responses persuaded you against the losing team's best TOPIC SPECIFIC arguments) *
SPEAKER COMMENTS
please compliment each debater

please give an improvement

-----------TELL THE DEBATER SPECIFICALLY WHAT TO DO TO IMPROVE "you should _____" "you would do better if you ____"

THINK ABOUT THINGS TO COMMENT ON:

--Structure = speech previews, clear use of Claim/Tag, Evidence/Support, Contentions, clearly organized

--Presentation = Clear speaker, animated, engaging, connects with judge

--Argument = well supported arguments, arguments relevant to the topic, strong analysis of points

--Refutation/Rebuilding/Crossfire = refutation--responds effectively to opponent arguments, crossfire--makes and responds effectively to questions in crossfire, rebuilding--defends partner's arguments well, makes team's arguments persuasive

DO NOT COMMENT ON SPEECH IMPEDIMENTS OR OTHER THINGS THE DEBATER CANNOT CHANGE.
DO NOT COMMENT ON NERVOUSNESS.
DO NOT COMMENT ON DEBATER APPEARANCE.

Pro Team 1st Speaker name (from ballot) *
State at least ONE COMPLIMENT and ONE IMPROVEMENT in Structure, Presentation, Argument, Refutation, Rebuilding plus Crossfire for the 1st Pro. *
Pro Team 2nd Speaker name (from ballot) *
State at least ONE COMPLIMENT and ONE IMPROVEMENT in Structure, Presentation, Argument, and Refutation/Rebuilding plus Crossfire for the 2nd Pro. *
Con Team 1st Speaker Name (from ballot) *
State at least ONE COMPLIMENT and ONE IMPROVEMENT in Structure, Presentation, Argument, and Refutation plus Crossfire for the 1st Con. *
Con Team 2nd Speaker Name (from ballot) *
State at least ONE COMPLIMENT and ONE IMPROVEMENT in Structure, Presentation, Argument, and Refutation/Rebuilding plus Crossfire for the 2nd Con. *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report