JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
2024-2025 Mentoring Program Evaluation - Form for New Faculty Member
* Indicates required question
Email
*
Record my email address with my response
MM
/
DD
/
YYYY
Name:
*
Your answer
Mentoring Committee:
*
Department chair:
Your answer
Mentoring Committee:
*
Chair of mentoring group:
Your answer
Mentoring Committee:
*
Third mentor:
Your answer
Rate the following items on a 1 - 5 scale to assess the extent to which the mentoring process over the last year or two has accomplished various goals:
Receiving a general orientation to the College and life in Gambier
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Obtaining basic knowledlge of what it means to be a faculty member
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Receiving help with professional writing or artistic productivity
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Setting career goals/ time-lines
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Time management
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Selecting educational or research projects
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Balancing personal and professional priorities
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Learning about Kenyon's organizational structure, piorities, politics, culture
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Learning about the culture of my department
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Fostering effective professional relationships in and outside the College
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Pedagogical approaches
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Managing students in class (advice about grading, extensions, plagiarism, etc.)
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
The role of academic advisor to students
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Preparation for the pre-tenure review (e.g.,advice about the prospectus, etc.)
*
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
Others - Please list:
*
Your answer
1. How often were your classes visted by your mentors?
*
Your answer
2. Describe the quantity and nature of contacts with your mentors.
*
Your answer
3. How useful was the year-end meetings?
*
Your answer
4. How could your experience of being mentored have been improved?
*
Your answer
5. Other comments.
*
Your answer
Before you submit this form, please check the box "Send me a copy of my responses" a copy of your response will be sent to you via email, please forward a copy of your email to Amy Quinlivan (
quinlivana@kenyon.edu
), by June 16
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Kenyon.
Does this form look suspicious?
Report
Forms
Help and feedback
Contact form owner
Help Forms improve
Report