WikiJournal peer review form
This is a form to return peer reviewer comments for an article submitted to a journal in the WikiJournal User Group.
Are you happy to have your identity open?
WikiJournals aim for maximum transparency. Please indicate whether you are happy to have your name associated with your reviewer comments (currently approx 65% choose to do so)
Have my identity open (preferred)
Have my identity anonymised
Relevant credentials/experience to demonstrate suitability as reviewer for this article (strongly advised if anonymous)
Title of work reviewed
We recommend that comments are constructive, and include both strengths and areas for improvement, and be referenced whenever possible. Review guidelines:
You may optionally upload an annotated version of the manuscript, or your comments as a pdf or docx at this secondary short form at
I wish to upload a PDF or DOCX file at
If you have any competing interests, please briefly describe them
You may ask to see the revised article and author responses after the authors have answered the review
I would like to see this article after author responses
Peer reviews and author responses are public and transparent for WikiJournals. Please confirm that you consent to this.
I agree for my review to be public and linked to from the reviewed work (under the Creative Commons Attribution License)
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Terms of Service