4. Examples

Here is a link to the recalculated results table for DFWC 2017:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pZJoOLgySq3L5-vicXnxzA7YGaxpX0eXQmqsf2jOMPwWe recalculated all rounds in DFWC 2017 using this methodology. Look it over, study it, and tell us your thoughts. Since we are not greatest at marketing all the wonders of this current system on paper, and more so, in charming people with our speech abilities, you will have to form your own opinion about the pros and cons of such a system without any biases. Spend time familiarizing yourself with this system, at least a little bit of time, and write why you are for or against it. Thank you.

The table is divided into rounds. In each round from left to right the following is shown: the rank of the player that round, time in milliseconds on the map, points awarded calculated by this system proposed. A column labeled preoverall – this shows the sum of all points in every round. The column labeled worst – the minimum points awarded from all the rounds. The column labeled overall – deducts the worst time (applying the nascar method) and we get our final outcome for the total points scored.

For comparison, there are also documents with the previous points system:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WhwfZVwvzaFdr8KkRYFdMlG0IXPvLjrbDLmSzEFq__AWith a simple system (where each next place is 1 point less than the previous one)

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1l5vWtI3BTKUh5HliW8Ga2fUWWKXJF4xcmzj-nhwOVmUAnd with the Nascar system, where the distribution of points is almost linear, and with exclusion of the worst result

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vdLypfipktfQ0y7fNgLmN9Nzngqd39GQZU_eYFlbcVg