JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Medicine 2.0'11 (incl Stanford Summit) Evaluation
All questions (except the first) are optional - leave questions which are not applicable or which you don't want to answer blank
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Which days did you attend?
*
Day 1 ("Stanford Summit")
Day 2 (Saturday) - Medicine 2.0 peer-reviewed program
Day 3 (Sunday) - Medicine 2.0 peer-reviewed program
did not attend
Other:
Required
1. How would you rate the following items on a scale of 1-10?
Please rate the pre-congress STANFORD SUMMIT (Friday) on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the PEER REVIEWED PROGRAM (Sat/Sun) on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Authors only: Please rate the quality of the PEER REVIEW COMMENTS you received (if any) on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the KEYNOTE OF JENNIFER AAKER on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the KEYNOTE OF BJ FOGG on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the KEYNOTE OF SUSANNAH FOX on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the VENUE on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate CATERING on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the WELCOME RECEPTION on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the WEBSITE on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the GENERAL ORGANISATION on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Please rate overall VALUE FOR MONEY on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very good
Clear selection
Remarks on your ratings, if any
Your answer
2.
The organizers of Medicine 2.0’11 offered an extra day with invited speakers on a separate day (“Summit”). Do you like this idea, or would you rather keep invited speakers in the main program?
very much dislike
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
very much like
Clear selection
3.
What did you learn or get out from this congress? (e.g., did it generate any new ideas or contacts?)
Your answer
4.
What did you like most about the congress? (what should we keep in future congresses?)
Your answer
5.
What did you dislike about the congress, what would you change for the next congress?
Your answer
6. How likely are you to attend a future Medicine 2.0 congress?
e.g. Medicine 2.0'12 in Boston at Harvard Medical School, Sept 15--16th, 2012
very unlikely
1
2
3
4
5
very likely
Clear selection
Remarks?
E.g. what can we do to increase that likelihood? Also let us know (provide your email address) if you wish to be contacted by the organizer to resolve any of the issues raised. (However, for refund requests, please contact Stanford University directly).
Your answer
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. -
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Does this form look suspicious?
Report
Forms
Help and feedback
Contact form owner
Help Forms improve
Report
