Short survey about the use of "guys" to describe programmers solving penguin problems. Answer it for science?
I'm having a disagreement about whether or not "guys" to refer to "programmers" implies that the programmers are men.

Instead of arguing, I thought it would be healthier and more mature to do science and collect some data about perceptions.

Let's all answer it in a spirit of "these are my actual thoughts when I hear those words", not "this is how I think language should be used"

I'll publish the data, minus email addresses, so we can have slightly more informed discussions.

***Update***: The results for this survey are up! You can see a discussion at
http://jvns.ca/blog/2013/12/27/guys-guys-guys/

and the data at:
https://github.com/jvns/guys-guys-guys

You can still fill it out for fun.

Hey guys! I just saw that a penguin escaped. *
I'm going out with the guys. You can deal with the penguins. *
We're going to need to hire a Python guy to deal with our penguin problems. *
This would never have happened if the Java guys were here. *
That penguin is such a good guy, though.
Those guys dealt with the penguin emergency so professionally. *
I met a great Erlang guy the other day who knows how to deal with thorny penguin issues *
Do you identify as a woman? *
Where do you live? (optional)
let's say "where do you live right now", for simplicity
Your answer
If you'd like me to send you the results, you can put your email address here.
Your answer
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms