Evaluation of the UrbanProof Toolkit
This is a short questionnaire for the evaluation of the UrbanProof toolkit. Please spend a few minutes to give your feedback, your opinion is very important for us!

* You may skip any question that you do not feel confident of your answer
© Giulia Soriente, My City/EEA
1. Is the information presented through the different stages of the UrbanProof toolkit comprehensible?
1.a. Comprehension of information provided in the form of maps, through the GIS environment.
1.b. Comprehension of information provided in the form of diagrams.
Captionless Image
1.c. Comprehension of information provided in the form of tables
Captionless Image
1.d. Comprehension of the terminology used.
Captionless Image
2. Do you think that the climatic scenarios used for the analysis is useful?
Two future GHG emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways-RCP) were used, namely the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. (i) Stabilization of GHG levels, with mitigation policies (RCP4.5), (ii) Increasing GHG levels, no mitigation policies (RCP8.5). The period 1971-2000 was used as the base period providing a reference for comparison with future projections for the period 2031-2060.
3. How would you rate the level of spatial analysis of results provided in Stage 2?
3.a. Project municipalities (urban block level)
Captionless Image
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Resolution analysis
3.b. All urban municipalities (500x500m grid cell)
Captionless Image
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Resolution analysis
4. How would you rate the visualization of the results in Stage 2?
4.a. Do you find the classification applied to the displayed data values useful?
Captionless Image
4.b. Do you find the zoom level capacity of the maps adequate?
Captionless Image
4.c. Do you find the “Transparency” feature useful?
Captionless Image
5. How would you rate the additional features provided through the toolbar menu of Stage 2?
5.a. “Info” feature
Captionless Image
Not useful
Very useful
5.b. “Compare” feature
Captionless Image
Not useful
Very useful
6. How would you rate Stage 5: Monitoring and review?
6.a. Do you think that there would be interest in applying the UrbanProof toolkit to other urban municipalities of Greece, Italy and Cyprus?
Very low interest
Very high interest
6.b. Do you find it easy to use?
Captionless Image
Very difficult
Very easy
7. Data transparency and accessibility
Captionless Image
Poor
Excellent
8, How would you rate the following capacities of the tool:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Operational ease
Speed and response time
User friendliness
Interactivity
9. How do you rate the guidance provided throughout the tool?
Captionless Image
Poor
Excellent
10. From your experience using the UrbanProof toolkit, what did you enjoy most and what would you recommend for future developments?
Your answer
Next
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy