Evaluation of the UrbanProof Toolkit
This is a short questionnaire for the evaluation of the UrbanProof toolkit. Please spend a few minutes to give your feedback, your opinion is very important for us!

* You may skip any question that you do not feel confident of your answer
© Giulia Soriente, My City/EEA
1. Is the information presented through the different stages of the UrbanProof toolkit comprehensible?
see relevant subquestions next
Stages of the UrbanProof Toolkit
1.a. Comprehension of information provided in the form of maps, in Stage 2 of the toolkit.
Clear selection
1.b. Comprehension of information provided in the form of diagrams.
Captionless Image
Clear selection
1.c. Comprehension of information provided in the form of tables
Captionless Image
Clear selection
1.d. Comprehension of the terminology used.
Captionless Image
Clear selection
2. Do you think that the available climatic scenarios are useful to the development of adaptation strategies?
Captionless Image
Clear selection
3. How would you rate the level of spatial analysis' results provided in Stage 2?
3.a. Project municipalities. Urban block level resolution.
Captionless Image
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Resolution analysis
Clear selection
3.b. All urban municipalities. 500x500m resolution.
Captionless Image
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Resolution analysis
Clear selection
4. How would you rate the visualization of the results in Stage 2?
4.a. Data values have been normalized using a 5-degree scale, where 1 refers to low impact indicators and 5 to high impact indicators. Do you think that the range of classes and the colors used to display the information on the map are practical and understandable?
Captionless Image
Clear selection
4.b. Do you find the zoom level capacity of the maps adequate?
Captionless Image
Clear selection
4.c. Do you find the “Transparency” feature (right-click on a thematic layer) useful for investigating information at multiple layers?
Captionless Image
Clear selection
5. How would you rate the additional features provided through the toolbar menu of Stage 2?
5.a. “Info” feature
Captionless Image
Not useful
Very useful
Clear selection
5.b. “Compare” feature
Captionless Image
Not useful
Very useful
Clear selection
6. How would you rate the applicability of the UrbanProof toolkit?
The URBANPROOF tool may be used for assessing climate change impacts and developing adaptation strategies by every urban Municipality of Greece, Italy and Cyprus.
Urban municipalities, as defined in the UrbanProof tool, include all level 2 local government units (LAU2 or communities) that are classified as: Cities (densely populated areas), Towns and suburbs (medium density areas).
Urban municipalities
Very low
Very high
Clear selection
7. Do you think that it would be useful to apply the UrbanProof toolkit in other urban municipalities of Greece, Italy and Cyprus to investigate climate change impacts and on the development of adaptation strategies?
Not useful
Very useful
Clear selection
8. Do you find it easy to use Stage 5 to investigate the effects of adaptation measures to reduce climate change impacts on a municipality?
Captionless Image
Very difficult
Very easy
Clear selection
9. How would you rate the guidance provided throughout the toolkit?
Captionless Image
Poor
Excellent
Clear selection
10. How would you rate data accessibility?
Captionless Image
Poor
Excellent
Clear selection
11. How would you rate the following characteristics of the toolkit:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Operational ease
Speed and response time
User friendliness
Interactivity
12. From your experience using the UrbanProof toolkit, what did you enjoy most and what would you recommend for future developments?
Next
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy