2019-2020 Spring Semester Student Course Evaluation
• This evaluation is part of our continuous effort to maintain academic and administrative quality.
• Please note that the results of this evaluation will be available to the instructor only AFTER final course grades have been submitted.
• We take your answers seriously, and we hope you will also take this survey seriously.
• Please write your comments at the end as well.

Thank you for participating in this evaluation.
A. Course evaluation ARCH201 Architectural Design Studio I (Letter A stands for “Strongly Agree” and letter F for “Strongly Disagree”.) *
1. Course outline matches course objectives and requirements of the course
2. All topics indicated in the course outline are covered
3. Assignments and homeworks lower the topics indicatd in the course outline
4. Instructional materials (lecture notes, reading materials, audio-visual materials, etc.) are useful for learning
5. Instructional activities (lectures, labs, tutorials, etc.) help learning
6. Level of difficulty of the course material is reasonable
7. Volume of the work required in the course is reasonable
8. The value of the overall learning experience through online teaching was…
B. The instructor Meltem Nevzat (Letter A stands for “Strongly Agree” and letter F for “Strongly Disagree”.) *
1. Follows the plan for the course as written in the course outline
2. Explains the grading system clearly, i.e. weights and content of each assessment
3. Explains the aims of each topic before lecturing
4. Is accessible to students after class hours through WhatsApp or e-mail.
5. Speaks in a manner that is easy to understand
6. Encourages students to ask questions
7. Comes to class in time (not late)
8. Does not leave the class early, i.e. uses all the time indicated in the program
9. Is always prepared for the lesson s/he teaches
10. Goes over the points again to ensure that students understand the lesson
11. Gives examinations that cover the topics lectured in the class
12. Evaluates and returns exams and assignments in time
13. Gives assignments and exams that are reasonable in length and difficulty
14. Grades exam papers, homework and projects fairly and impartially
15. The overall teaching effectiveness of the instructor was…
1. What do you like best about this course? *
2. What would you like to change about the course? *
3. What are the instructor's strengths (good aspects)? *
4. What suggestions do you have to improve the instructor's teaching? *
5. Other comments *
C. To what extend do you think you have achieved the below course learning outcomes? (Letter A stands for “Strongly Agree” and letter F for “Strongly Disagree”.) *
1. Ability of the exploration of advanced representational materials and techniques, modeling freehand sketching as a way of developing ideas and concepts.
2. Competence of critical and way of thinking as a designer.
3. To produce self motivated and self generated design and concepts employing imagination.
4. Competence of manual skills in order to form the individual design approach.
5. Ability to resist and overcome the difficulties of creative design process.
6. To be able to design multi storey and multi functional buildings.
7. Ability of understanding different design languages and competency of design vocabulary.
8. Ability to make design topic related research.
9. To be able to respond to climatic and ecological conditions.
D. Self-Reflection (Letter A stands for “Strongly Agree” and letter F for “Strongly Disagree”.) *
1. How do you grade your attendance to this course?
2. Was your English sufficient to follow the course?
3. What is your current Grade Point Average (GPA)?
4. What is your expected grade in this course?
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Rauf Denktas University. Report Abuse