UMAP'2016 Feedback
We put this form to collect your feedback after UMAP'2016. The goal is to evaluate the new presentation format (short presentations + posters) worked, the workshops and tutorials, the experience with the ACM registration system, and also how you enjoyed the venue, social events, foods, accommodation.
Do you think the new presentation format (short presentations and posters) should continue next year?
Do you think the 3 categories of published submissions in the main conference (full papers, short papers and extended abstracts) should continue?
Do you think the poster, demo, and late-breaking results got sufficient exposure during the Wednesday poster reception?
Do you think UMAP'2016 had a good workshop program?
Should there be more awards (e.g. for the best reviewer, for the best poster, etc.)?
What program elements did you not like?
Your answer
Next
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms