OESI Project Proposal Reviewer Nomination Form

The Ocean Energy Safety Institute (OESI) aims to join government, academia, industry and scientific stakeholders for collaborative research using shared learning and dialogue. OESI is organized under an agreement between the Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station and the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement and the U.S. Department of Energy.

OESI’s specific objectives are to:

  • Increase the energy security of the United States, enable jobs and increase economic activity through responsible and sustainable ocean energy production.
  • Develop knowledge, technologies and training that increase the U.S. ability to produce ocean energy resources safely and sustainably.
  • Engage the best technologists, managers, facilities, and standard and policy developers who have the greatest chance to achieve our goals in the most efficient, collaborative environment possible.
Volunteering to be an OESI project proposal reviewer allows the nominee's valuable expertise to directly influence the OESI research portfolio.  The nominee input helps ensure that every dollar of OESI research has the best chance at positively impacting the safety of offshore energy development in the United States.  Collective nominee rankings provide the critical feedback across the Academia-Government-Industry landscape necessary to properly select and fund the right safety related research that can save lives and reduce impacts to the environment.

This form is used by the Ocean Energy Safety Institute's (OESI) operations staff to collected required information from potential research project proposal reviewers from Academia, Government and Industry.  This collected information will be used to ensure Subject Matter Expert (SME) review of proposed OESI project proposals and inform a recommended research portfolio.  If selected, each reviewer will be expected to: 
  • Perform complete and consistent review of submitted proposal elements
  • Review all proposals submitted under the assigned pathway 
  • Refrain from disclosing any project proposal information beyond the OESI operations team
  • Accept that they are disqualified from participation in any project team proposing within proposal pathways they are assigned to review (Reviewers can propose projects under pathways which they are not reviewing for)
The time commitment of each OESI project proposal reviewer is targeted to be less than one half (1/2) day per pathway area.  The review period will last three weeks in which time all assigned reviews must be completed. The reviewer rankings will only be counted once all of the proposals have been reviewed within their assigned pathway area(s). Please indicate your preference for review pathway areas in up to four pathways. The last question asks how many pathway areas the nominee is willing to review.

PLEASE REVIEW the OESI Research Roadmap at: https://oesi.tamu.edu/research/ before completing this nomination form.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Nominee name: *
Nominee email address: *
Nominee contact mobile number (will be used for password txt messaging): *
Nominee Collected Metrics
This section gathers each nominee's key metrics to facilitate OESI project proposal reviewer selection and provide a summary of anonymous reviewer metrics to OESI stakeholders.
Nominee stakeholder category is best described as: *
Nominee highest degree achieved is best described as: *
Nominee years of experience in their professional career is best described as: *
Which of the following statements best describe the nominee's experience with safety? *
Please select the level of direct experience you have with offshore energy operations. *
Only in office during my career
Only offshore during my career
Please describe how your experience would aid identification and evaluation of offshore energy safety related research proposals. *
Subject Matter Expertise Areas
The following questions ask the OESI project proposal reviewer nominee to confirm which research pathways within the published OESI Marine Energy Roadmap they believe are within their expertise.  The full OESI Research Roadmap can be found at: https://oesi.tamu.edu/research/

OESI Research Roadmap Target and Pathways (page 1)
OESI Research Roadmap Target and Pathways (page 2)
Select the first choice Roadmap Pathway that is within the nominee's expertise. (OG refers to Oil & Gas pathways, W refers to Wind pathways, M refers to Marine pathways) For more information review the published OESI Research Roadmap at: https://oesi.tamu.edu/research/
*
Select the second choice Roadmap Pathway that is within the nominee's expertise. (OG refers to Oil & Gas pathways, W refers to Wind pathways, M refers to Marine pathways) For more information review the published OESI Research Roadmap at: https://oesi.tamu.edu/research/
*
Select the third choice Roadmap Pathway that is within the nominee's expertise. (OG refers to Oil & Gas pathways, W refers to Wind pathways, M refers to Marine pathways) For more information review the published OESI Research Roadmap at: https://oesi.tamu.edu/research/
Select the fourth choice Roadmap Pathway that is within the nominee's expertise. (OG refers to Oil & Gas pathways, W refers to Wind pathways, M refers to Marine pathways) For more information review the published OESI Research Roadmap at: https://oesi.tamu.edu/research/
As an OESI project proposal reviewer, the nominee will review the following number of complete proposal sets: *
If chosen to review OESI proposals, each reviewer will have to sign and submit a Conflict of Interest (COI)  Form to TEES Compliance. Please review the COI form at: https://oesi.tamu.edu/resources/reviewers-conflict-of-interest/

*
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of OOC.

Does this form look suspicious? Report