Student Satisfaction Survey

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Instructions to fill the questionnaire
● All questions should be compulsorily attempted.
● Each question has five responses, choose the most appropriate one.
● The response to the qualitative question no. 21 is student’s opportunity to give suggestions or improvements; (Kindly restrict your response to teaching learning process only)

Student Name *

University Roll No. *

Session: *

Program *

Semester *

1. How much of the syllabus was covered in the class? 4 – 85 to 100% 3 – 70 to 84% 2 – 55 to 69% 1– 30 to 54% 0 –Below 30%

2. How well did the teachers prepare for the classes? 4 –Thoroughly 3 – Satisfactorily 2 – Poorly 1 – Indifferently 0 – Won’t teach at all *

3. How well were the teachers able to communicate? 4 – Always effective 3 – Sometimes effective 2 – Just satisfactorily 1– Generally ineffective 0– Very poor communication *

4. The teacher’s approach to teaching can best be described as 4– Excellent 3 – Very good 2 – Good 1 – Fair 0– Poor *

5. Fairness of the internal evaluation process by the teachers. 4 – Always fair 3 – Usually fair 2 – Sometimes unfair 1 – Usually unfair 0– Unfair *

6. Was your performance in MSEs anf discussed with you? 4 – Every time 3 – Usually 2 – Occasionally/Sometimes 1 – Rarely 0– Never *

7. The institute takes active interest in promoting internship, student exchange, field visit opportunities for students.4 – Regularly 3 – Often 2 – Sometimes 1 – Rarely 0– Never *

8. The teaching and mentoring process in your institution facilitates you in cognitive, social and emotional growth. 4 – Significantly 3 – Very well 2 – Moderately 1 – Marginally 0– Not at all *

9. The institution provides multiple opportunities to learn and grow. 4 – Strongly agree 3 – Agree 2 – Neutral 1 – Disagree 0– Strongly disagree *

10. Teachers inform you about your expected competencies, course outcomes and programme outcomes. 4 – Every time 3 – Usually 2– Occasionally/Sometimes 1 – Rarely 0– Never *

11. The teachers illustrate the concepts through examples and applications. 4 – Every time 3 – Usually 2 – Occasionally/Sometimes 1– Rarely 0 – Never *

12. The teachers identify your strengths and encourage you with providing right level of challenges. 4 – Fully 3 – Reasonably 2 – Partially 1 – Slightly 0– Unable to *

13. Teachers are able to identify your weaknesses and help you to overcome them. 4 – Every time 3 – Usually 2 – Occasionally/Sometimes 1 – Rarely 0 – Never *

14. The institution makes effort to engage students in the monitoring, review and continuous quality improvement of the teaching learning process 4 – Strongly agree 3 – Agree 2 – Neutral 1 – Disagree 0 – Strongly disagree *

15. The institute/ teachers use student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies for enhancing learning experiences. 4 – To a great extent 3 – Moderate 2 – Some what 1 – Very little 0 – Not at all *

16. Teachers encourage you to participate in extracurricular activities. 4 – Strongly agree 3 – Agree 2 – Neutral 1 – Disagree 0 – Strongly disagree *

17. Efforts are made by the institute/ teachers to inculcate soft skills, life skills and employability skills to make you ready for the world of work. 4 – To a great extent 3 – Moderate 2 – Some what 1 – Very little 0 – Not at all *

18. What percentage of teachers use ICT tools such as LCD projector, Multimedia, etc. while teaching. 4 – Above 90% 3–70–89% 2–50–69% 1–30–49% 0 – Below 29% *

19. The overall quality of teaching-learning process in your institute is very good. 4 –Strongly agree 3 – Agree 2 – Neutral 1 – Disagree 0 – Strongly disagree

20. Give three observation / suggestions to improve the overall teaching – learning experience in your institution *

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This form was created inside of PCTE Group of Institutes.

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Forms