The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss
Scheme WG2 Yellow/Kronos Edition ballot
40 responses
Loading...
0. What is your name?
No responses yet for this question.
1. [non-portable macro system] Should R7RS provide R6RS syntax-case?
No responses yet for this question.
2. [non-portable macro system] Should R7RS provide explicit renaming?
No responses yet for this question.
3. [non-portable macro system] Should R7RS provide the R6RS identifier-syntax macro transformer?
No responses yet for this question.
4. [non-portable macro feature] Should R7RS provide syntax parameters (hygiene bending)?
No responses yet for this question.
5. [non-portable macro feature] Should R7RS provide R6RS-style splicing versions of let-syntax and letrec-syntax?
No responses yet for this question.
6. [non-portable macro feature] Should R7RS provide identifier aliasing?
No responses yet for this question.
7. [non-portable macro feature] Should R7RS allow arbitrary properties to be attached to an identifier?
No responses yet for this question.
8. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide a generalization of cond to allow different kinds of falsy value or multiple values?
No responses yet for this question.
9. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide syntax for binding a single multiple-valued expression to local variables?
No responses yet for this question.
10. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide syntax for binding a local variable to its body for recursive use?
No responses yet for this question.
11. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide syntax for specializing parameters?
No responses yet for this question.
12. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide named let with rest arguments?
No responses yet for this question.
13. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide syntax (not lexical syntax) for infix notation?
No responses yet for this question.
14. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS allow definitions like (define ((foo a b) d e f), where foo accepts arguments a and b and returns a procedure that accepts arguments d, e, and f?
No responses yet for this question.
15. Should R7RS provide a library of portable syntax-rules macros and procedures for handling multiple values?
No responses yet for this question.
Waiting for responses
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
