(Scroll down for questionnaire)
There are least three EV curbside models today
Homeowner or landlord installs and operates charging equipment.
Connects to the property’s existing utility meter.
Requires city permitting, easement, and liability insurance.
The City of Palo Alto may subsidize installation, with the condition that chargers offer some free community use.
May offer tax incentives for property owners / landlords.
Pros: Low city cost; encourages private investment.
Cons: Complex permits/liability; uneven access.
Companies such as itselectric.us install and manage chargers.
Equipment connects to the homeowner’s or landlord’s meter with consent.
Residents and community members share chargers.
Revenue-sharing model: property owners may receive a portion of usage fees.
Pros: Professionally installed/maintained; revenue-sharing incentive.
Cons: Dependent on landlord consent; may favor affluent areas.
EV chargers integrated directly into existing streetlight poles.
Power comes from the city’s electrical grid.
Owned and operated by the City of Palo Alto.
Provides equitable, public charging across neighborhoods.
Pros: Equitable, public access with city oversight.
Cons: High upfront city cost; slower rollout.
Does this form look suspicious? Report