Trebuchet Peer Review

Self/Peer Reviews

-Intellectual Contribution (ideas, discussion, analysis)
-Hands-on Contribution (drawing, construction, testing)
-Opportunity to assess your own effort relative to that of your peers
-Confidential
-Note significant team problems if they exist
-Uneven participation
-Unproductive team meetings
-Team member personality issues
-Opportunity to praise good efforts by team members
Evaluation Form:
-First, write your own name in the first blank followed by your team members
names in the consecutive blanks.
-On a scale from 1-5 grade your contribution and then that of your peers
according to:
-1 poor 2 below average 3 average 4 good 5 excellent
o Excellent (5) = makes original contributions to team; does extra work for the
project. Spends extra time and effort on the project.
o Good (4) = does all jobs thoroughly and well; does all jobs without being
asked. Attends all team meetings without being asked.
o Average (3) = does what is required; sometimes needs to be asked to work or
to attend meetings.
o Below Average (2) = makes some contribution; often needs prodding. Misses
a significant number of meetings.
o Poor (1) = has a negligible or even negative impact on team project.

    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question
    This is a required question