BioVis 2013 Survey
This survey consists of three pages: (1) Evaluation of BioVis 2013 (2) Suggestions for future BioVis symposia (3) Demographics
It is very important to us to collect your feedback about BioVis 2013, both to evaluate this year's meeting and to plan future meetings. Thank you very much in advance for taking the time to respond to this survey. WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU IF YOU HAVEN'T ATTENDED THE WHOLE SYMPOSIUM!
* Required
Evaluation of the Sessions
We would like to hear your opinion about the scientific content of the sessions.
How do you rate the content of the Keynote session?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of the Keynote session accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
What did you like about the keynote, what did you not like?
Your answer
How do you rate the content of the Primers (short topic introductions before the paper sessions)?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Did the Primers help you to better understand the presentations in the corresponding session?
*
Yes
No
NA
What did you like about the primers, what did you not like?
Your answer
How do you rate the content of Paper Session 1 (Visualizing Sequence and Omics Data)?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of Paper Session 1 accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
How do you rate the content of Paper Session 2 (Visualizing Cellular and Molecular Data)?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of Paper Session 2 accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
How do you rate the content of Paper Session 3 (Visualizing Networks and Interactions)?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of Paper Session 3 accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
How do you rate the content of Paper Session 4 (Visualizing Population and Function)?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of Paper Session 4 accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
How do you rate the content of the Poster Session?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of the Poster Session accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
What did you like about the Poster Session, what did you not like?
Your answer
How do you rate the content of the Challenges Session?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of Challenges Session accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
What did you like about the Challenges Session, what did you not like?
Your answer
How do you rate the content of the Data Contest Session?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of Data Contest Session accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
What did you like about the Data Contest Session, what did you not like?
Your answer
How do you rate the content of the ReDesign Contest Session?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Didn't attend this session
Was the content of Redesign Contest Session accessible to you?
*
All
Some
None
NA
What did you like about the Redesign Contest Session, what did you not like?
Your answer
Evaluation of the Symposium
We would like to hear your view on the meeting as a whole.
How do you rate the overall content of the meeting?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
NA
How do you rate the overall organization of the meeting?
*
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
NA
Are you planning to attend future BioVis meetings?
*
yes
unsure
no
Next
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
Forms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy