The Antiquities Act
Read the following article on the use of the Antiquities act to create, reduce, or eliminate National Monuments and answer the series of thought questions at the end. (NOTE - Text is adapted to remove names of recent politicians and political affiliations)
How We Got National Monuments
Becky Little (Aug 22, 2018) History.com
The 111-year-old law that allowed a current presidents shrink two Native-American cultural sites
In 1872, Yellowstone became the first U.S. national park, and it earned this status the same way new parks still do today: First Congress passed legislation declaring it a national park, and then the president (at the time, Ulysses S. Grant) signed it into law.
But by 1906, the country was changing quickly, and its leaders thought they needed a way to quickly take control of that change.
Congress and President Teddy Roosevelt legalized a new procedure for protecting federal lands. The Antiquities Act established the preservation of historic buildings and archaeological sites as “national monuments,” in addition to the natural wonders that had been preserved as parks. And very significantly, it gave the president the authority to establish national monuments by themselves, without having to get Congress’ approval first.
At the time, scientists argued that the bill was necessary because Native American cultural sites were being looted and in danger of disappearing, and that waiting for congressional action could be too late.
Which brings us to 2017, and why presidents are able to change the size of monuments like Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante—the most recent action is the “largest rollback of federal land protection in the nation’s history,” reported a national news network — seemingly in a day.
From the Roosevelt administration through Barack Obama’s, every president except three has used their authority to establish national monuments. Since 1906, U.S. presidents have dedicated more than 120 national monuments, though some have since been abolished or re-designated by Congress.
Of all of the presidents, a recent president was by far the most prolific user of the Antiquities Act. During his two terms, he created or expanded 34 national monuments, including the headquarters of the National Woman’s Party and the Stonewall Inn, site of the famous LGBT protest in 1969. A less recent president established Grand Staircase-Escalante, and a more recent president designated Bears Ears.
Was the recent president’s action legal? That’s still up for debate. Any measures having to do with national parks must go through Congress, and many measures about national monuments have gone through Congress, too. Yet legal experts are divided about how much a president can unilaterally change a national monument’s status.
Although the recent president is not the first president to reduce the size of national monument on his own, the Times notes that no court has ever ruled whether this is legal. The Antiquities Act doesn’t specify whether presidents can do this, but some lawyers have argued that by granting the president the ability to create national monuments, it implicitly allows them to shrink or change them.
There is a lot at stake in the protection of federal lands, including the preservation of Native American cultural sites, and the legality of the president’s actions could very well end up in court. Yet for now, the murky legal situation offers up a strange irony: the act that made it easier for presidents to protect federal lands may also have made it easier for other presidents to challenge all of those presidents’ monuments without having to go through Congress.
Name (Last, First)
1. How is the executive branch (President and Executive Bureaucracy) involved in the creation or reduction of National Monuments?
2. How is the legislative branch (congress: House of Representatives and Senate) involved in the process of creating National Monuments? How is this different than the designation of National Parks? (Note: part two of question may require internet research)
3. How is the judicial branch (the Supreme Court) involved in the process of creating or reducing National Monuments?
4. What is the reasoning for why Presidents should NOT be able to reduce or eliminate National Monuments without congressional approval?
5. What is the reasoning for why Presidents SHOULD be able to reduce or eliminate National Monuments without congressional approval?
6. What is your opinion as to whether Presidents should be allowed to reduce or eliminate National Monuments? Explain your reasoning and provide evidence that supports your thinking.
Send me a copy of my responses.
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Terms of Service