Guideline for reviewers

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

The journal use external experts to help evaluate articles and assist the editors to make a decision.

ARTICLE TITLE: *

Evaluation criteria

1. Actuality of the paper

Please select all that apply

Actual

Less actual

Not actual

Clear selection

2. Compliance of the research methods with the content of the article

Is in compliance

Is partially compatible

Is not in compliance

Clear selection

3. Quality of research conducted

Satisfactory

Partially satisfactory

Not satisfactory

Clear selection

4. Does the article contain plagiarism signs?

Does not exist

Partially contained

Is plagiarism

Clear selection

5. Conclusions

Important and Significant

Partially significant

Considerable

Not important

Clear selection

6. Analysis of used statistical information (if any)

New statistical information was used

Used an outdated statistical information

The statistical information can not provide a full scientific study

Clear selection

7. Quality of used literature

Used the latest literature

Used partly outdated and inappropriate literature

Used outdated literature

Clear selection

8. საერთო დასკვნა

The article is well written, it can be printed

The article is written with some shortcomings, but it can be printed

The article contains important shortcomings and it can be printed after processing

The article can not be printed

Clear selection

Comments (optional)

Reviewer *

Date *

YYYY

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

Forms

This form was created inside of BPENGI - Magazines.