International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) has not yet opened its reviewer data. However, there's a noticeable interest in the community to view how scores are distributed. In light of this, we are exploring the possibility of gathering ratings and confidence levels
anonymously to create a visualization of scores that meets this interest.
We acknowledge that this method **
might lead to bias**. The number of filled data will be updated on the Paper Copilot site
without modification and
no personal data will be collected.
Please fill in the ratings and confidences in the same order split by commas ',' e.g.:
Ratings: 3,6,6,8
Confidence: 1,2,3,4
[Total Submitted Responses (update every 8 hours PST daytime)]
Main Conference
- Valid Initial Responses (Remove Redundancy and Invalid Input)
- Valid Rebuttal Responses (press [s] and switch to rebuttal with overlaid bars or scattered chart)
Notice:
- 10: Top 5% of accepted papers, seminal paper9: Top 15% of accepted papers, strong accept8: Top 50% of accepted papers, clear accept7: Good paper, accept6: Marginally above acceptance threshold5: Marginally below acceptance threshold4: Ok but not good enough - rejection3: Clear rejection2: Strong rejection1: Trivial or wrong
- You can update your submission anytime when you re-visit this link, we'll consider only the latest submitted data for every paper ID (paper ID is only used for the accuracy of the review curve, false paper ID will introduce noise to the collected data).
- This Google form will be removed if there's no response or if the reviews are publicly available. We'll also update this on Twitter during the discussion, follow me if needed