Request edit access
Community Survey on the HET Postdoc Acceptance Deadline

Dear colleague,

Since 2007, the HET community has adopted a universal agreement in which most institutions have pledged to set postdoc acceptance deadlines no earlier than January 7. This agreement has been critical for establishing a standard of equity and fairness in hiring and recruiting practices, allowing several generations of postdocs to make life and career decisions with the maximum amount of information at their disposal. It is thus imperative to preserve this concept of a common deadline.

The purpose of this survey is to gather information from the community on how well the specific Jan 7 deadline is working for them and whether shifting the deadline to later in January or February might be more optimal.  This effort is motivated by two themes that we have heard repeatedly:  

(1) The Jan 7 deadline is too soon after the holidaysOn the applicant side, the timing can make it challenging to reach senior colleagues for advice on job options, and to interact with and/or schedule visits with prospective employers.  Additionally, community members balancing family commitments like child-care and elder-care during the holiday season can feel an extra burden. On the hiring side, the lack of administrative support during this time  makes it more difficult to respond promptly as initial offers are being declined. In addition, the holiday break makes it difficult to schedule time amongst colleagues to have thoughtful discussions about the candidates.

(2) The Jan 7 deadline conflicts with established deadlines in the astroparticle and cosmology communities, which have a growing overlap with the HET community.  The common acceptance deadline in the astronomy community is Feb 15.

We have informally polled colleagues from institutions across the world and have compiled a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available here.  It is our hope that this survey will provide a more comprehensive assessment of the level of support for shifting the postdoc acceptance deadline later than Jan 7.

We appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with us. Please leave us your response and any questions or comments, if you have any. You are welcome to participate anonymously, though we encourage you to leave us your e-mail address. This will enable us to keep you informed on the survey results and any future progress in this effort. 

If you have any comments or questions not addressed through this survey, please feel free to email us at het.postdoc.deadline@gmail.com.

Thank you for your participation and best regards,

Djuna Croon (Durham U.), Patrick Fox (Fermilab), Roni Harnik (Fermilab), Simon Knapen (LBNL), Mariangela Lisanti (Princeton/Flatiron), Lina Necib (MIT), Tien-Tien Yu (U. Oregon)

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Name
Institution
If you are in support of reconsidering the Jan 7 date for the common deadline (assuming broad community consensus), would you be willing to have your name and affiliation listed publicly?  All other provided information would remain anonymous.
Clear selection
Assuming there is broad community consensus, please rate your level of agreement with the following suggested timeframes for the postdoc acceptance deadline.  We remind you that this survey is non-binding and for purely information gathering purposes. *
Administratively Impossible
Not Preferred
Neutral
Preferred
January 7 (current deadline)
Mid-January (around Jan 15)
End-of-January (around Jan 30)
February 15 (astronomy deadline)
Current Position *
Where are you located? *
HET Sub-Field *
Required
What is your first-choice for the postdoc acceptance deadline? *
If a new agreement is drafted, I would prefer it to include a clause stating that the agreement only go into effect after a large fraction of the institutions which signed the original 2007 agreement have signed on.  *
What would you find the most concerning about a change in deadline? Please check all that applies. 
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report