Request edit access
JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Lis-Forum Survey of MLISc Dissertation
Dear Friends,
I request you to participate in this survey. The main objective of this survey is to know the engagement of LIS community in LIS-Forum. LIS-Forum is the most popular professional communication platform for LIS community in India. It is very interesting to know about the usage of LIS-Forum by LIS community in India and abroad.
Your participation is greatly appreciated.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Your Age
*
22-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65 and over
Your gender
*
Male
Female
If you are from India, mention your state/union territory
Your answer
If you are a foreign national, mention your country name
Your answer
You are a
*
Student
Research Scholar
Librarian
Retired library professional
Faculty
If you are a working professional, mention type of your library
*
School Library
College Library
University Library
Public Library
Corporate Library
Special Library
Other Library
Where did you first learned about LIS-Forum?
*
From LIS School
From professional friends
From Internet (e.g. Search engines, Blogs, Journals etc.)
Other sources
How often do you check LIS-Forum messages?
*
Rarely
At least once a month
At least once a week
Daily
Do you visit message archive for checking older posts?
*
Yes
No
Have you posted messages in the LIS-Forum?
*
Yes
No
If Yes, how many messages you have posted in last one year?
*
Less than 5
Between 5-10
More than 10
Quality of messages/postings in LIS-Forum
*
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Very Poor
How helpful do you find the messages/postings in the LIS-Forum?
*
Often
Sometimes
Seldom
Never
Timeliness of content in LIS-Forum messages/postings
*
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Very Poor
Does the Lis-Forum provide information for your requirements?
*
Yes
Sometimes
No
Below is a range of LIS-Forum topics. Please rate how interested you are in each item on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "not interested at all" and where 5 means "very interested."
Events
*
(e.g. Seminar, workshops)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
Reference queries
*
(Request for specific information)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
Opportunities
*
(e.g. Job announcement)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
Higher education
*
(e.g. Admission to various courses, programmes etc)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
Service matters
*
(e.g. Discussion on salary, promotion etc.)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
Scholarly communication
*
(e.g. Call for journal articles, conference papers, Book chapters etc. Helpful information for writing, plagiarism etc.)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
Surveys
*
(Invitation to participate surveys)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
Technology
*
(e.g. News and updates on library technology)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
Collection development
*
(Various inquiries regarding library collection building)
Not interested at all
1
2
3
4
5
Very interested
What do you dislike with LIS-Forum?
*
Complex format
Some things/items are not of interest
The content are poor
Negative or personal content
Topics are not raised for discussion
Nothing
Required
Which of the following improvements or additions you like to see in LIS-Forum service?
User profiles
Real time interaction with other professionals
Tagging
Message sharing with social networks
RSS feed
User profiles
SMS Alert
In additon to above mentioned features, any other suggestions in your mind to improve LIS-Forum service?
Your answer
Do you have any other general comments you would like to share?
Your answer
Are you a member of other discussion forums in LIS domain?
*
Yes
No
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. -
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Does this form look suspicious?
Report
Forms
Help and feedback
Contact form owner
Help Forms improve
Report