Request edit access
Feedback form to conference participant report
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Title of the report *
Is the subject of the work corresponding to the nature (subject and purpose) of conference? *
Is the subject of the work innovative and is based on original research? *
Is the title of the report consistent with its contents? *
Does Abstract contain a sufficient amount of clear and comprehensible information? *
Does the keywords characterize the content of the report? *
Are fixed in the paper goals appropriate and relevant to the subject of the work? *
Is the material and research methods selected properly and presented in a precise and transparent way? *
Are the theoretical basis and issues of the problem describe clearly? *
Is the nomenclature correct and met the international standards? *
Is the presentation of the results performed correctly and completely? *
Do the conclusions include the information that the objectives have been achieved? *
Is the language of the article suitable for scientific work? *
The attractiveness level of the report
The level of presentation of problem *
The anticipated attention by the scientific community *
The comments and suggestions for authors:
Information about the reviewer (optional)
Name
Surname
Academic degree, academic title, post
Affiliation
Country, city
Other important information about the reviewer
Website content and administration - Sofiia Sokolova, Assoc. Prof., Ph.D.
A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy