Q3 What according to you, was the aim of of the WSIS review?
Your answer
Q4 How many meetings did you attend as part of the WSIS review? *
Please make reference to any formal meetings as well as informal civil society/regional efforts you participated in.
Your answer
Q5 In your opinion, how adequate were the formal opportunities for civil society to participate in the WSIS review? *
On a scale of 1-5
Participatory processes need urgent reform
Highly participatory
Q6 What barriers did you face in engaging with the WSIS review?
Please note any challenges you faced, including modalities, internal capacity, knowledge, resources, skills, structural or political obstacles etc.
Your answer
Q8 What issues did you/your organization/ your constituents prioritize in the review process? *
List 3 in descending order of importance
Your answer
Q9 To what extent were your initial priorities and objectives reflected in the final outcomes? (On a scale of 1-5) *
Priorities not reflected at all
Outcome mirrored our expectations
Q11 In your opinion, what was the value of civil society participation in the Review?
Your answer
Q12 How effective were civil society efforts to influence the WSIS review? *
Not effective at all
Very effective
Q14 How effective were civil society coalitions or coordination meetings in putting forward the interest of the civil society constituency at the UN GA? *
Not effective at all
Very effective
Q15 What issues would you like to be highlighted in the next decade of the WSIS process? *
List the most important issues 3
Your answer
Submit
Page 1 of 1
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of National Law University Delhi.