Request edit access
Webinar 3 : My opinions and understanding
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Unlike previous multiple choice questions, in this one THERE ARE NO CORRECT ANSWERS.  The idea is to get a feel for what made sense to you, what you agreed or disagreed with, and what you found relevant.
Your email address:  OPTIONAL!
3.1 It is clear to me how gravity and the ground reaction force "squeeze" the body to cause it to collapse. (Lecture 3.1)
Yes this is very clear to me
No this is not at all clear to me
Clear selection
3.2 I understand what cocontraction is. (Lecture 3.1)
Yes definitely
No definitely not
Clear selection
3.3 I understand what dynamic feedback is. (Lecture 3.1)
Yes definitely
No definitely not
Clear selection
3.4 The idea of different postural matching strategies (cocontraction, dynamic feedback) helps me to better understand Alexander Technique experiences from a scientific perspective. (Lecture 3.1)
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
Clear selection
3.5 I feel like I can clearly explain what center of mass is and can explain why the center of mass has to move over the feet during sit to stand (Lecture 3.1)
Yes, this is perfectly clear
No, this is not clear at all.
Clear selection
3.6  I understand how momentum changes the timing in sit to stand (Lecture 3.1)
Yes this is perfectly clear
No this is not clear at all.
Clear selection
3.7 The concept of "quasistatic" movement is clear to me. (Lecture 3.1)
Yes this is perfectly clear
No this is not clear at all.
Clear selection
3.8  Understanding the biomechanics of sit to stand will some change aspects of the way I teach in the future.
I strongly agree
I strongly disagree
Clear selection
3.9  Understanding the biomechanics of sit to stand will likely change the way I explain the challenges of sit to stand in the future.
I strongly agree
I strongly disagree
Clear selection
3.10 In his experiment about sit to stand, Tim explained  the control group's inability to perform a deep slow, smooth sit to stand movement with a model of automatic postural support activity interferring with movement planning.  This model makes sense and is the most reasonable explanation.
Yes strongly agree
No strongly disagree
Clear selection
3.11 When I work on sit to stand with a student, I am working on a postural support task much more than a movement task.
Yes I strongly agree
No I strongly disagree
Clear selection
3.12 One of the things I am teaching my students is how to match external forces using dynamic strategies rather than cocontraction.
Yes I strongly agree
No I strongly disagree
Clear selection
Do you have any comments about these topics?
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms