Request edit access
CSI-Model Analysis: Feedback Questionnaire
Your answers will be treated anonymously. Your name will only be used to connect your answers to your inspection records. No individual information will be made public in any form.
Please answer the questions in English.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Name *
Participant-ID *
1. Feedback on Model Analysis
1.1 Did you find the Crowdsourcing application helpful to analyse models and model elements? *
Not helpful
Very helpful
1.2 Was it easy to analyse the model and to identify defects? *
Very difficult
Very easy
1.3 What made the model analysis easy / difficult? *
1.4 Did you follow the instructions provided by the guideline /Crowdflower process? *
1.5 Do you think that provided entities, attributes, and relationships can support the model analysis tasks? *
No
Definitely
2. Technical Infrastructure
2.1 Which technical infrastructure did you use? *
2.2 Which screen did you use? *
2.3 Did you use a “Memory File” to note some comments for reusing purposes? *
3. Feedback on Model Analysis Results
3.1 Do you think you identified all defects in the model? *
No
Yes, I found all of them
3.2 How many true (distinct) defects do you think you found? *
3.3 What share of true defects do you think you found (0-100%)? *
3.4 How many critical (distinct) defects do you think you found? *
3.5 How many critical defects do you expect to be in the model after fixing the critical defects you reported? *
3.6 If there are remaining defects in the model, what hindered you in finding all defects? *
3.7 Do you think that the model analysis approach can help to improve software development (e.g., software design)? *
No
Definitely
3.8 Do you think that the model analysis approach can help to support defect detection? *
No
Definitely
3.9 Would you use the model analysis approach again? *
No
Definitely
4. Additional comments
Thank your for your participation!
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Universidade Federal Fluminense.

Does this form look suspicious? Report