Ethics @ West Penn Student Review of Presentations
 This is the forum where you can rate the presentations of your classmates. Please be thoughtful, kind and considerate as these ratings will account for 5% of the group's overall project grade.  You are responsible for reviewing all of the other groups in our class excluding the group to which you belong. (This is completed on the Peer Review Form.). Your responses are confidential. Groups will only see anonymized and summarized responses/reactions to their presentations along with a performance average.  

All reviews are due at midnight Monday on Weeks 8; late reviews will not count toward your class participation grade. Please try to be timely in giving substantive feedback. Your reviews must give helpful feedback to the groups that are presenting on any given day. Posting comments like "good presentation" or "nice work" will not earn full participation credit. If you have questions about submitting substantive replies, please reference the instructions on the project assignment page.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Last Name *
 Please enter your last name.
 First Name *
 Please enter your first name.
 Please choose the group that you belong to below. *
 Please enter your group number below.
 Please choose the group that you are reviewing below. *
 Please enter the group number below.
Rating Team Performance
Communication: team communicates in a professional manner; introduces members in the project; does not use slang/street language throughout the presentation; students are also able to answer complex questions about the presentation in a professional manner. *
 How well did the group communicate its core ideas regarding the ethical  challenge/dilemma?
Not Clear
Very Clear & Concise
 Clarity: the presentation is well prepared; visuals contribute to clarity introducing both the ethical issue and related theory for the audience; the visuals were designed versus copied from other websites/media (e.g., text, periodicals, magazines, etc.); the media presentation is tightly interwoven with the talk such that the audience is not watching students set up visual information. Everything is ready to go and flows smoothly. *
Do you understand this ethical challenge better as a result of seeing the group's presentation?
Not clear at all.
Much clearer understanding
Connection to theory: the application of the ethical theory to the medical issue/dilemma is clear at the end of the presentation. The team also presented a cogent history surrounding this particular medical issue or dilemma. *
 Is the connection to the ethical theory presented clear?
Application not clear
Ethical comparison is well done!
Presentation strengths:  please describe one or two aspects of the group's presentation that contributed to a better understanding of the medical dilemma and/or ethical theory. *
 Suggested length: 1-2 sentences with substantive feedback.
Presentation do-overs:  if the group had a chance to give this presentation a second time, what could they do to more clearly present the medical issues/dilemma and/or the ethical theory used for comparison? *
 Suggested length: 1-2 sentences with substantive feedback.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
GoogleForms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.