JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Proposal Evaluation phase 1
Dear EAB member, we now have to assess the proposed abstracts :
there are three levels of evaluation.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
I am:
*
Choose
Jashim Khan
Sharyn Rundle-Thiele
Norchène Ben Dahmane Mouelhi
Jari Salo
Saïd Ettis
Despoina Karayanni
Zhenzhen Zhao
Christine Balagué
Basma Taieb
Lili Nemec Zlatolas
Jean-Eric Pelet
I review:
*
2 - Mobile Commerce (2nd reading)
3 - Does consumer behavior in M-commerce is fundamentally different from its behavior on E-commerce? (2nd reading)
12 - Privacy and security issues on mobile applications (2nd reading)
13 - Proposed Platform for Social Media Commerce (2nd reading)
14 - The future of mobile learning (2nd reading)
18 - Perception on the Use of Social Network Tool for Education Learning (2nd reading)
19 - Inbound Marketing toward a conceptual definition (2nd reading)
20 - Mobile Augmented Reality: Evolving human-computer interaction
21 - Mobile Technical Infrastructure to Assist Enterprises in Evaluating and Implementing Mobile Applications
22 - Using Cognitive Psychology to Understand Anticipated User Experience (AUX) in Computing Products
1. The quality of the problem formulation is:
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
2. The quality of the organization (logical flow) of the proposal is:
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
3. The quality of the communication (readability, clarity, grammar) of the proposal is:
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
4.1 Conceptual clarity (definitions and descriptions of constructs):
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
4.2 Operationalization of variables
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
4.3 Research design, including sampling, data collection
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
4.4 Data analysis
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
5. The proposal's contribution to the discipline is:
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
6. The quality of conclusions and recommendations (managerial implications and suggestions for further research) is:
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
7: The proposal's probability to stimulate debate at the conference is:
*
very poor
1
2
3
4
5
very high
8. Overall recommendation:
*
Choose
Strongly recommend rejecting
Lean towards recommending rejecting
Lean towards recommending accepting
Strongly recommend accepting
9. Comments:
*
Your answer
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. -
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Does this form look suspicious?
Report
Forms
Help and feedback
Contact form owner
Help Forms improve
Report