The 2013 Lawfare Readership Survey
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Which of the following best describes you?
Clear selection
What do you use Lawfare for? (Please check all that apply)
How often do you read Lawfare?
Clear selection
How do you access Lawfare content? (Please check all that apply)
We are constantly trying to calibrate the volume of coverage to find the right mix between a vibrant site and one that is overwhelming. Do you think the number of posts we publish is:
Not enough
Too much
Clear selection
We are in the process of incorporating Lawfare as a 501(c)3 non-profit in order to expand the portfolio of activities and services it can provide. We are considering a variety of additional activities, some of which may be costly to produce. Would you be open to paying for services like: (Please check all that apply)
Lawfare does not take advertising and will always remain a non-commercial, free website. But we have to fund its operations and are exploring a variety of options to do so. Would you be open to direct fundraising appeals to readers?
Clear selection
Lawfare sometimes gets criticized for bias in our coverage. To what extent do you trust Lawfare as a source for analysis?
I trust Lawfare very little.
I trust Lawfare a great deal.
Clear selection
Which of the following features do you find of particular value? (Please check all that apply)
How often do you listen to the Lawfare Podcast?
Clear selection
If you do listen to the Podcast, how do you access episodes? (Please check all that apply)
How often do you read our book reviews?
Clear selection
If you follow our coverage of the military commission cases, do you think our coverage is:
Clear selection
How often do you read Today's Headlines and Commentary?
Clear selection
Recently, we launched an experimental new feature entitled “The Week That Was,” which summarizes content on Lawfare over the previous week. The feature is published on Saturdays, and is meant for readers who aren’t able to follow the site’s content as it's published. Do you find this feature useful?
Clear selection
There are various topics that we have spent a lot of time covering on Lawfare that aren't, strictly speaking, legal issues. These include robotics, Pakistani and Middle Eastern politics, domestic drones etc. Would you like to see more coverage of these--and other--areas ancillary to national security law?
Clear selection
Do you use our categories and tags to locate material on the blog?
Clear selection
If you have additional comments or feedback about Lawfare, please provide it below.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.