Request edit access
Chief Justice Loretta Rush: NO RUSH, 2024
Despite being a Republican, CJ Rush is soft on crime and violates property rights of citizens while discriminating against disabled people. She does not enforce the Constitution; she protects her friends.

She is part of the Republican Party's dictatorship over the State of Indiana. Her friends populate the federal courts and the 7th Circuit is overwhelmingly Republican, as is the U.S. Supreme Court. The abuses below are ultimately the fault of the voters who put these people in office.

If you don't like a 1-party dictatorship that abuses its powers, STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN. You can start down that path by rejecting the retention of Loretta Rush and voting for a Democrat for governor to replace her in 2024.

Rush is the worst chief justice of any state and her vicelike grip on the Indiana Supreme Court should serve as an example of a state supreme court totally insulated against positive reforms.

This page created by Andrew U. D. Straw on 5/23/2024: www.andrewstraw.com 
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Culprit on the Ballot: NO RUSH
Indiana in Distress: NO RUSH
Captionless Image
Indiana Voters Decide in 2024: NO RUSH
LORETTA RUSH: SOFT ON CRIME
Did you know that Loretta Rush (on her birthday, May 11) only imposed 30 days of suspension on former Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill after holding that he committed sexual crimes 4x against 4 women not of his race? 
In re Hill, 144 N.E.3d 184 (Ind. 5/11/2020)
LORETTA RUSH: U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS 8TH AMENDMENT VIOLATOR
Did you know that Loretta Rush's opinion against application of the 8th Amendment was overturned 9-0 by the U.S. Supreme Court in an excessive fines property rights case? 
Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. 146 (2019)

FACT: Loretta Rush calls other people incompetent but she led the other 4 Indiana justices to violate the 8th Amendment of the Bill of Rights with her. She imposes punishment for imcompetence on others but she should resign for her own incompetence in this landmark constitutional case that she got totally wrong. She took an oath to uphold the Constitution and Bill of Rights and she refused to do it.

FACT: The 4 underling justices who followed Rush in 8th Amendment error all endorse her for retention in 2024. But they only get 4 votes. Millions of regular voters will decide that, not them.

If Rush won't leave, voters should make her leave.

NO RUSH
LORETTA RUSH: PROPERTY RIGHTS VIOLATOR
Did you know that Loretta Rush destroyed the law licenses of a disabled attorney, Andrew Straw, in retaliation for his disability complaints about Rush's Court, and that no property compensation was provided after ruining Straw's career, leaving him in poverty after Straw was an attorney who worked for the former Chief Justice?
In re Straw, 68 N.E.3d 1070 (Ind. 2/14/2017)

FACT: 7.5+ years of suspension was imposed without Straw committing any crime or dishonest act.

FACT: the Virginia State Bar exonerated Straw by calling the attack on Straw a "Drive-by Shooting" by the Indiana Supreme Court. It said Straw proved he did not deserve any sanction to a level of "clear and convincing evidence."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.404880/gov.uscourts.cand.404880.22.21.pdf

FACT: An expert witness excoriated the Indiana Supreme Court for its dishonesty in attacking Straw.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.404880/gov.uscourts.cand.404880.22.22.pdf

Straw is suing Indiana in Virginia: http://vb.andrewstraw.com 

If Rush won't leave, voters should make her leave.

NO RUSH
LORETTA RUSH: DISABILITY DISCRIMINATOR
Did you know that under Loretta Rush, the Admission & Discipline Rules of the Indiana Supreme Court ban all people with disabilities, physical and mental, from being lawyers, and lump them together with drug addicts?
Ind. Adm. & Disc. R. 23, Sections 2(c) & 3(b)

https://www.in.gov/courts/rules/ad_dis/index.html#_Toc139466484

Rush also punished a former attorney who worked for the Indiana Supreme Court and became severely disabled driving to that Court to work: Andrew U. D. Straw. She took his law license with a bogus suspension that attacked Straw's disability rights work in federal court.

Rush suspended Straw for pressing for stronger disability rights:

1) the right to Medicare claims privacy that a newspaper was trying to invade with extortionate threats of $1,000 per day fines from Medicare which were invented out of whole cloth and that Medicare said itself said was impossible. Rush punished Straw's demand for Medicare privacy.

2) Straw said the ABA should collect data on the number of disabled law school applicants and students the same way they do for race and gender (which have been collected for decades). Rush said to ask for this was incompetent.

3) Straw said that the ADA, Title II, mandates that states must give disabled parents their parenting time. Rush said that was incompetent.

4) Straw said he did not have to file a lawsuit for a client that never gave explict instructions to do so and there was a written contract that Straw would only do negotiation and NOT file a lawsuit. Rush punished Straw for not filing the lawsuit that was never authorized.

If Rush won't leave, voters should make her leave.

NO RUSH
LORETTA RUSH: SOFT ON JUDICIAL CRIMINALS
Did you know that Rush banks on the pity people have for her family being attacked by a mentally ill client of hers who choked her husband, but then when Republican judges choked members of the public, Rush protected them with light punishment?

https://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2022/09/21/brandon-kaiser-2019-shooting-indiana-judges-indianapolis-white-castle-death/69509911007/

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/15/us/indiana-judges-white-castle-brawl-trnd/index.html 

FACT: Those Republican judges committed crimes and should have been removed from office for unfitness, but Rush protected them. When the "right people" are getting choked, Rush protects the chokers.

If Rush won't leave, voters should make her leave.

NO RUSH
LORETTA RUSH: ALREADY 65
Did you know that an Indiana justice may only serve to the age of 75 and as of May 11, 2024, Rush is already 65, making her incapable of serving the whole term for which she is running?

FACT: Rush is already the age of retirement and she can and should step aside for someone younger.

If Rush won't leave, voters should make her leave.

NO RUSH
FACT: Rush apparently lied on her 2023 financial statement and after Fox News discovered it, she revised it so it was accurate. Supreme Court justices should not be receiving salaries from other entities, no matter who they are. The former president of Purdue, Mitch Daniels, appointed Rush to the Indiana Supreme Court. A justice should know when she is being paid thousands of dollars. Dishonesty and greed is not a good look for a judge or justice. Isn't her $214,586 a year enough for her?

https://fox59.com/investigations/a-deeper-dive-into-the-finances-of-indiana-supreme-court-justices/
NO RUSH
  • By Andrew U. D. Straw. August 8, 2024
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms