Copy responder link
Copy
Published
Section 1 of 1
The Real AI Alignment Problem - V 1.1: Article Feedback
Thank you for reviewing "The Real AI Alignment Problem: It's Us, Not Them (Version 1.0). This Key Concept article introduces the R.E.A.L. (Relational, Evolving Alignment for Liberation) framework and was developed collaboratively by humans and four AI assistants. 

Important Guidelines:
  • Please read the entire article carefully before responding
  • We're seeking substantive feedback on the core ideas and overall impact
  • The article is already at its target length (~6,300 words), so we can't add significant new content to the main text (though appendices could be expanded if truly necessary)
  • Focus on whether the article achieves its primary goal: being skillfully provocative and conversation-starting for both technical and non-technical audiences
  • Consider how effectively it presents R.E.A.L. Alignment as a framework worth serious consideration
1. Reviewer Name:
Question Type
Loading image…
Answer key
(0 points)
Loading...
Loading…
2. What aspects of the article did you find most compelling, effective, or insightful? Which parts best serve the goal of being skillfully provocative and conversation-starting?
Question Type
Loading image…
Answer key
(0 points)
Loading...
Loading…
3. What aspects of the article felt least effective or compelling? Were there sections that didn't resonate or seemed to detract from the main message?
Question Type
Loading image…
Answer key
(0 points)
Loading...
Loading…
4. If you were to recommend 1-3 substantive improvements (not minor edits), what would they be? Consider changes that would make the article more impactful, clear, or persuasive without significantly increasing length.
Question Type
Loading image…
Answer key
(0 points)
Loading...
Loading…
5. How effectively does the article balance technical accuracy with accessibility? Would it resonate with both AI experts and the broader public?
Question Type
Loading image…
Answer key
(0 points)
Loading...
Loading…
6. Any other comments or suggestions?
Question Type
Loading image…
Answer key
(0 points)
Loading...
Loading…
Link to Sheets
Insights
Total points distribution
Loading...
Loading responses…
1. Reviewer Name:
Copy chart
No responses yet for this question.
2. What aspects of the article did you find most compelling, effective, or insightful? Which parts best serve the goal of being skillfully provocative and conversation-starting?
No responses yet for this question.
3. What aspects of the article felt least effective or compelling? Were there sections that didn't resonate or seemed to detract from the main message?
No responses yet for this question.
4. If you were to recommend 1-3 substantive improvements (not minor edits), what would they be? Consider changes that would make the article more impactful, clear, or persuasive without significantly increasing length.
No responses yet for this question.
5. How effectively does the article balance technical accuracy with accessibility? Would it resonate with both AI experts and the broader public?
No responses yet for this question.
6. Any other comments or suggestions?
No responses yet for this question.
Settings
Responses
Manage how responses are collected and protected
Presentation
Manage how the form and responses are presented
Defaults
Form defaults
Settings applied to this form and new forms
Question defaults
Settings applied to all new questions
.