Webinar 5 : My opinions and understanding

Request edit access

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Unlike previous multiple choice questions, in this one THERE ARE NO CORRECT ANSWERS. The idea is to get a feel for what made sense to you, what you agreed or disagreed with, and what you found relevant.

Your email address: OPTIONAL!

5.1 I have a good basic understanding of executive inhibition and how it is measured. (Lecture 5.1)

I strongly agree

I strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.2 It is important that any AT teacher with an interest in the science of AT understand the basics of executive inhibition. (Lecture 5.1)

I strongly agree

I strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.3 I understand the difference between reactive and proactive inhibition (Lecture 5.1)

I strongly agree

I strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.4 I understand what selective inhibition is. (Lecture 5.1)

Strongly agree

Strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.5 I have used the word inhibition in more than one way when talking about AT, as suggested by the 3 categories of AT inhibition described in the webinar and in Patrick's essay. (Lecture 5.1)

I strongly agree

I strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.6 The assertion that AT teachers describe inhibition in a variety of ways, as described in the webinar and in Patrick's essay, is useful for my understanding of and ability to explain inhibition. (Lecture 5.1)

I strongly agree

I strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.7 Rajal's experiment about walking with a tray and inhibition is both relevant and useful when describing the science behind AT (Lecture 5.2)

I strongly agree

I strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.8 Questioning whether various lurches and stiffening are due to lack of inhibition or lack of available underlying support patterns is a useful challenge for my understanding of AT science (Lecture 5.2)

Yes I strongly agree

No I strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.9 I understand Ian Loram's model of the importance of sensory analysis and inhibition in AT (Webinar 5.1 slide 44)

I agree strongly

I disagree strongly

Clear selection

5.10 Ian Loram's model of the importance of sensory analysis and inhibition in AT provides a reasonable and useful explanation of the science of AT (Webinar 5.1 slide 44)

I strongly agree

I strongly disagree

Clear selection

5.11 Gabrielle Wulf's description of internal and external focus make sense to me.

Yes this makes complete sense

No I didn't understand this at all

Clear selection

5.12 Gabrielle Wulf's description of internal and external focus is useful for thinking about AT attention and directions

I strongly agree

I strongly disagree

Clear selection

Do you have any comments about these topics?

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Forms