Request edit access
TGGS Lecture Evaluation
Dear Students,
TGGS aims to offer a high standard of teaching. To collect your feedback regarding the lectures you attend, we would like you to answer a few questions. Please kindly fill out this survey once for each course. This survey is carried out in accordance with QA regulations. The participation is anonymous and kindly appreciated.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
*
Please provide the 6 capital letters code you received.
Program *
Semester *
Academic Year *
Course ID and name *
Lecturer's name *
1. Student's Details
1.1 Gender
Clear selection
1.2 Semester
Clear selection
1.3 Nationality
Clear selection
2. Lectures
*
Please read through each of the following statements and choose anything from 5 to 1 whether they (5) fully apply or (1) do not apply. If you cannot tell, you may tick "No comment". (5 = fully applies, 1 = does not apply)
5
4
3
2
1
No comment
2.1 I understand the relevance of the lectures.
2.2 The lectures are clearly structured.
2.3 The lectures can be followed-up with the available materials (script, textbooks, handouts, etc.)
2.4 I have sufficient prior knowledge for these lectures.
2.5 The examples chosen facilitate understanding of the lectures' contents.
too high
medium
too low
2.6 The level of difficulty is:
Clear selection
very good
good
satisfactory
sufficient
insufficient
2.7 I would grade the lectures:
Clear selection
3. General Conditions
yes
no
3.1 The lecture usually starts on time.
3.2 The lecture usually ends on time.
Clear selection
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 or more
3.3 How many times has the lecture been cancelled / postponed?
Clear selection
3.4 Are there any external conditions which impair you during or regarding the lecture?
(You may check several boxes)
Yes
No
S/He was always present.
3.5 Has the lecturer been substituted properly, whenever he/she was unavailable?
Clear selection
4. Lecturer
The lecturer... *
5 = fully applies, 1 = does not apply
5
4
3
2
1
No comment
4.1 ...imparts the contents of the lecture in an intelligible manner.
4.2 ... responds with great care to questions of understanding.
4.3 ... considers the different levels of knowledge of the students.
4.4 ... makes me enthusiastic about the topic of the lecture.
4.5 ... speak loud and clear in an appropriate manner.
4.6 ... speaks a proper, comprehensible English.
4.7 ... sums up the lecture's contents in appropriate intervals.
4.8 ... is open to improvement suggestions.
4.9 ... is available outside lecture times, e.g. during business hours or by e-mail.
4.10 ... employs auxiliary materials (blackboard, overhead projector, projector, demonstrations, etc.) appropriately.
4.11 ... writes and draws in a legible manner.
4.12 ... arranges blackboard texts, transparencies, then content of presentation slides in a clear and logical way.
too fast
appropriate
too slow
4.13 The pace of the lecture is...
Clear selection
very good
good
satisfactory
sufficient
insufficient
4.14 I would grade the lecturer with...
Clear selection
5. Special Suggestions, Critique, Wishes
In your opinion, what makes the lecture especially bad or good? How can the lecture be improved (presentation, media, equipment, ect.), are there any external conditions that impair you during the lectures?
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of TGGS.

Does this form look suspicious? Report