Request edit access
Rigorous AI Review Feedback
All responses will be handled confidentially.

Thank you for using the Rigorous AI Reviewer!
We’re committed to helping researchers receive actionable, high-quality feedback that speeds up the iteration process and increases your chances of getting published. Your input is essential to improving our AI review system. By filling out this short survey, you’re directly contributing to making the tool more useful, accurate, and impactful for the research community. All responses are confidential and deeply appreciated.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Q1: Are you a PhD or Senior researcher *
Q2. How useful did you find the AI-generated feedback overall?
*
not useful at all
very useful
Q3. Compared to previous human feedback, how would you rate the AI feedback?
Human feedback is more useful
AI feedback is more useful
Clear selection
Q4. What were the most valuable aspects of the AI feedback?
*
Q5. What was the least helpful or most confusing part of the AI feedback?
*
Q6. How many US-Dollars would you be willing to pay for one AI review if it consistently provided useful and actionable suggestions that siginficantly increase your chances of getting your manuscript accepted.
*
Q7. What has been the most valuable piece of peer revision feedback you've ever received? *
Q8. What would be a good quantity range of actionable suggestions a review should ideally contain? (e.g., 10-50 suggestions OR 5-10 pages of review feedback)  *
Q9. In your view, what aspects of a scientific manuscript should be evaluated during peer review? Please mention specific manuscript sections (e.g., methods, discussion) and the criteria (e.g., clarity, rigor, novelty) you believe are most important for each.
Q10. Do you have further suggestions, tips, ideas?
Q11. How did you hear about the AI Reviewer?
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report