EINCO 2016 - Call for Reviewers
EINCO 2016 will implement a double-blind peer review process (please see our "Review Policy" on http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/einco-2016-review-policy/).
The success and strength of the EINCO 2016 technical and scientific program depends on volunteers taking a few minutes of their precious time to read papers submitted and giving a thoughtful review. Being a reviewer is a matter of prestige and personnel achievement. All peer-reviewers will be mentioned on a special acknowledgement-area of our EINCO website (visit http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/the-fes-conference-2016/), called "EINCO 2016 Editorial Review Board".
Efforts of reviewers are the key for the objectives of a fair and timely review process for all the papers submitted to the EINCO 2016 and the publications of only papers of the highest quality. We greatly appreciate reviewers for their help.

Applications to join the "EINCO 2016 Editorial Review Board" are invited from academics, experts and specialists researching in the field of Economic Sciences, covering the research topics described on the EINCO 2016 website (please, see there "Sections and Sub-sections Descriptions & Contacts" available on http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/einco-2016-sections-and-sub-sections-descriptions-contacts/).
Membership of the "EINCO 2016 Editorial Review Board" is restricted to faculty members and senior researchers having a doctorate (or an equivalent degree), and significant publishing and reviewing experience.  Due to the high volume of applications, only accepted applicants will be contacted via e-mail.

If you would like to be considered as a member of the "EINCO 2016 Editorial Review Board" (a reviewer for submitted papers to the EINCO 2016), please complete the following form and click on the "Submit" button.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Last Name: *
Please, write your name in UPPER case, only (e.g., SMITH)
First Name: *
Please, write all your first names, by capitalizing each one (e.g., John Peter)
Title: *
Applicants must have a doctorate (or an equivalent degree), and significant publishing and reviewing experience.
Position: *
Are you a….? *
Required
Institution/organisation/affiliation: *
Town/City: *
Country: *
Telephone number: *
E-mail address: *
If you would like us to link to your departmental or personal website please give the URL here: *
I would like to review papers submitted for the following SUB-SECTION of the EINCO 2016 conference: *
According to your research area of competence, you should select only one sub-section from those listed below, which you consider to be most appropriate to your specialization/field of research.
Please list your research interests/topics that are relevant to the above selected SUB-SECTION of the EINCO 2016 conference: *
List your research interests/topics as copy/paste the appropriate ones from the sub-section description available on http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/sections-and-sub-sections-descriptions-contacts/
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
At the time of the review of a paper considered for publication in the Journal “The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences” (AUOES), reviewers must take into consideration the following ethical standards:
1.  Reviewers commit themselves to assist the Editorial Board in the editorial decisions regarding the suitability of a paper for publication in the AUOES.
2.  Manuscripts will always be evaluated only based on their intellectual merit and contribution to the aims and scope of the AUOES and the EINCO Conference, as the reviewers should adhere to standards of fairness, integrity, and objectivity. Kindly note that personal criticism is unacceptable.
3. Reviewers who feel that their review comments might be biased and/or unqualified regarding a particular manuscript submitted for publication to the AUOES should notify the AUOES Editorial Board immediately and excuse themselves from the review process.
4. Reviewers should be clear in their review comments and provide proper explanations and arguments for their decisions. If suspicion is raised about the originality of the manuscript (unattributed to source), reviewers are expected to notify the Editorial Board immediately, with the appropriate justification.
5. During the review process, reviewers will keep in mind at all times that the manuscript and related materials are confidential.
6. Reviewers warrant that they will not use the manuscripts and related materials submitted to the EINCO Conference for publication in the AUOES for any other purpose other than the double-blind peer review process, without the AUOES Editorial Board´s and/or author´s permission.
*
Required
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms