Request edit access
LunGradCon Speaker Feedback Form - Nick Piskurich; Compositional characterization of the enigmatic irregular mare patches via M3 and Diviner data analyses
For all sections, please comment on things that were done both well and poorly. Some things to think about are included in each section, but please add anything you think would be useful. Rate the quality of each section from 1 (low) to 5 (high).
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Speaking Style
Speaking style
could be improved
effective
Clear selection
Did the speaker sound confident or unprepared? Was the speaker easy or hard to understand?
Visual Aids
Visual aids
could be improved
effective
Clear selection
How effective were the speaker’s slides in communicating their message? Were the slides wordy, cluttered, or sparse? Were plots or graphs explained well and/or labeled clearly?
Communication of Material
Communication of the material
could be improved
effective
Clear selection
How effectively did the speaker explain their presentation? Were you able to understand and follow the speaker’s message?  Was the talk presented in a logical, consistent manner?
Work Significance
Discussion of the significance of the work
could be improved
effective
Clear selection
How well did the speaker put their presentation in the context of lunar exploration and planetary science, in general?
Handling of Questions & Comments
Handling of questions and comments
could be improved
effective
Clear selection
How well did the speaker handle questions during/after the presentation? Were the questions resolved in a satisfactory manner?
Other Feedback
Things the speaker did well:
Other ways the speaker could improve:
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms