Brazil’s forests, wetlands, and savannas are crucial to a great diversity of Indigenous peoples, the stability of our global climate, and biodiversity conservation (1). By working toward dismantling anti-deforestation policies, Brazil’s new administration threatens Indigenous rights and the natural areas they protect (2).The EU spent more than €3 billion on Brazilian iron imports in 2017 (3), despite perilous safety standards and extensive deforestation driven by mining (4). In 2011 alone, the EU imported beef and livestock feed associated with more than 1000 km2 of Brazilian deforestation [equivalent to more than 300 football fields per day (5)]. The EU thus urgently needs to strengthen efforts on sustainable trade (6–8) and uphold its commitments on human rights, environmental protection, and climate change mitigation (9).
Halting deforestation makes economic sense as intact forests are critical to maintaining the rain-fall patterns on which Brazilian agriculture depends (10). Restoring degraded lands and improving yields could meet rising agricultural demand for at least two decades without need for further for-est clearance (11). We urge the EU to make trade negotiations with Brazil conditional on: (i) upholding the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; (ii) improving procedures to trace commodities associated with deforestation and Indigenous rights conflicts; and (iii) consulting with, and gaining consent, from Indigenous Peoples and lo-cal communities to define strict social and environmental criteria for traded commodities.
The EU was founded on the principles of respecting human rights and human dignity. Today, it has the opportunity to be a global leader in sup-porting these principles and a habitable climate by making sustainability the cornerstone of its trade negotiations with Brazil.
Signed (so far) by Laura Kehoe, Tiago Reis, Malika Virah-Sawmy, Tobias Kuemmerle, over 600 European sustainability scientists, and over 300 Brazilian Indigenous groups
Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the scientists in Brazil who offered guidance and support for this letter.
References:1. T. H. Ricketts et al., Indigenous Lands, Protected Areas, and Slowing Climate Change. PLOS Biol. 8, e1000331 (2010).2. D. Abessa, A. Famá, L. Buruaem, The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts. Nat. Ecol. Evol. (2019), doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0855-9. 3. Eurostat, “Brazil-EU – international trade in goods statistics” (2018), (available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Brazil-EU_–_international_trade_in_goods_statistics#Most_traded_goods:_aircraft_and_associated_equipment).4. L. J. Sonter et al., Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Commun. 8, 1013 (2017).5. S. Henders, U. M. Persson, T. Kastner, Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 125012 (2015).6. European Commission, Roadmap - Deforestation and forest degradation – stepping up EU action (2018), (https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/ares-2018-6516782_en).7. Amsterdam Declarations Partnership (2018), (https://ad-partnership.org/about/).8. European Commission, Implementation of the Trade and sustainable development (TSD) chapter in trade agreements - TSD committee and civil society meetings (2018), (http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1870).9. European Parliament, “Transparent and accountable management of natural resources - International Commitments 2014-2019,” (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-TA-2018-0333+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN).10. D. Lawrence, K. Vandecar, Effects of tropical deforestation on climate and agriculture. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 27–36 (2014).11. B. B. N. Strassburg et al., When enough should be enough: Improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Glob. Environ. Chang. 28, 84–97 (2014).