Peerspectives Take-Home Assignment #2

Request edit access

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Reviewing the Reviewers: Critiquing Three Peer Review Reports

Please submit your responses by Day, Month DD, 20YY @ HH:MM (timezone)

Email *

Your first name *

Your last name *

Part 1: Instructions

Based on what you learned in the last lecture, critique the following three peer review reports that were actually submitted to the BMJ for the same manuscript.

Some aspects to consider:

Would this review be informative for the editor? Useful/helpful for the authors? Is anything missing? Is anything inappropriate? Is the tone/language appropriate?

Keep your responses under 300 words. Bullet point lists are fine.

Question 1A. Review A Feedback *

Insert screenshot of the first block of peer review text here.

Question 1B. Review B Feedback *

Insert screenshot of the second block of peer review text here.

Question 1C. Review C Feedback *

Insert screenshot of the third block of peer review text here.

Question 2: Rank the 3 peer review reports. (#1 should be the one that you think is the best!) *

#1: the best

#2: middle

#3: the worst

Report A

Report B

Report C

Question 3:

Revisit your pre-course assessment (hint: you should be able to find it in your recently sent email items if nowhere else!) and reflect on the utility of your review to 1) the editor and 2) the authors. Thinking back to lectures 1 and 2, what are some things you could do to improve your peer review report? Write 3 to 5 items / bullet points in response, max. 300 words.

A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

reCAPTCHA

Privacy Terms

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Forms