August WRTG596 Workshop Evaluation
The workshop evaluation invites you to provide your instructor with anonymous input about your experience over these two weeks. Providing this feedback gives your instructor a chance to make adjustments and accommodations, when appropriate, in WRTG596 this fall and in future August workshops. Please spend a few minutes providing complete, detailed answers to the questions below.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
1. Evaluate the following aspects of the workshop: *
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Frequently
Always
The activities and assignments in the workshop met my needs as I prepare to teach in the upcoming semester.
The instructor communicated instructions and expectations in a manner appropriate for a graduate-level workshop.
Guest presenters were well-prepared and addressed issues relevant to my preparation for the upcoming semester.
The instructor was available for consultation or assistance and allowed sufficient time during the workshop to answer my questions.
The assigned readings accorded with my preparations for teaching in the First-year Writing Program.
I felt appropriately challenged and supported throughout the workshop.
Throughout the workshop, I was treated like a respected colleague who was being welcomed into a vibrant community of practice.
2. Would you describe your instructor as: *
No
Yes
a. Knowledgeable about teaching?
b. Able to communicate ideas clearly?
c. Knowledgeable about composition studies?
d. Prepared for the workshop?
e. Skilled at leading and moderating discussion?
f. Open to the views of workshop participants?
g. Enthusiastic about workshop assignments and activities?
h. Intellectually engaging?
i. Fair?
j. Professional?
3. Please provide written comments to explain one or two of your answers to the previous question.
Include the letter of the item you are commenting on. E.g., d. Prepared for the workshop.
4. Please rate the quality of the following workshop activities, readings, and guests on a scale from 1-5. *
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
a. Mapping Activity (Monday, 8/17)
b. Responding and Grading (Friday, 8/21) - Comments on Sam Michael's Literacy Narrative
c. Peer response (Monday, 8/24)
d. Theory-Practice-Phronesis Presentation and Discussion (Monday, 8/24)
e. Andrea Lunsford's "The Nature of Composition Studies" (reading)
f. Eleanor Kutz and Hephzibah Roskelly, "Writing as Composing" and "Creating the Classroom Community" (reading)
g. Louise Phelps, "Rhythm and Pattern in a Composing Life" (reading)
h. Guest: Steve Krause
i. Guest: Panel with returning GAs
j. Guest: Ann Blakeslee and Kim Pavlock (UWC)
k. Guest: Student services panel (Ombuds, DRC, CAPS, and judicial services)
l. FYWP Fall Meeting (8/22)
m. Presentation and workshop led by Andrea Lunsford (Thursday, 8/20)
5. Please provide written comments to explain one or two of your answers to the previous question.
Include the letter of the item you are commenting on.
6. What changes would you recommend to the workshop? Are there specific conversations you thought were for any reason not worthwhile or germane to your teaching preparation this fall?
7. What do you consider to be the strongest feature(s) of the workshop?
8. Please rate the overall quality of the August WRTG596 Workshop.
Clear selection
9. Please rate the overall quality of the instructor leading the August WRTG596 Workshop.
Clear selection
10. Use the this space to provide any additional comments you want to share about the instructor or the workshop.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms