To: City of Oakland - AC Transit Interagency Liaison Committee
From: Traffic Violence Rapid Response
Date: December 12, 2022
Subject: Design Recommendations for International Bus Rapid Transit
The following memorandum summarizes Traffic Violence Rapid Response’s design recommendations for the International Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit corridor based on comprehensive site observations (detailed in the attached report) and transportation planner peer review.
Our organization maintains the strong position that the City of Oakland and AC Transit should continue to support the International Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit project and install necessary rapid-response traffic calming devices that will improve safety for all people traveling along International Blvd., as well as bring the design of the system more in line with international performance BRT standards.
Design Recommendations
Policy Recommendations
This document catalogs types of traffic safety behaviors observed on the International Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit corridor related to pedestrian safety, vehicle speeding and dangerous driving. This document also provides design improvements from the NACTO Urban Street Design Guide and Transit Street Design Guide to address observed traffic safety behaviors that can be implemented quickly at low-cost.
Document Outline
There are 4 primary issues that enable dangerous driving that “piggybacks” off of the bus only lane intended for TEMPO. We document them in order of severity (worst in terms of pedestrian safety) below.
Drivers use the uncongested bus-only lane to speed in front of congested traffic. These drivers often travel at high speeds for several blocks at a time, often running red lights and endangering others on the street. This behavior can be observed every few minutes along portions of International Blvd.
Image: Vehicle seen speeding in the bus only lane.
This reckless behavior is especially dangerous when drivers speed past bus stops where pedestrians are either waiting or crossing to and from bus stations. Speeding drivers can reach and maintain speeds that make it impossible to safely stop should a pedestrian step in front of them. Worse, congestion in the outside lane reduces visibility at the crosswalk, increasing the risk a pedestrian will “pop out” from the travel lane and in front of the driver speeding in the bus only lane. This behavior is especially common along portions of the corridor with a hardened center line (see diagram below).
Above: An example popular multi-block run from 45th to 52nd Ave. Using the bus lane, vehicles speed about 7 blocks and can take advantage of the hardened center lane to build up speed over multiple blocks, only slowing down (without stopping) to run 2 red lights (shown as stars) before reaching 52nd (which is also often jumped to continue the run). See Appendix A: Videos of speeding in bus-only lanes
Proposed design treatment:
Drivers use the left turn lane to jump the queue at traffic signals. When the traffic light turns green for traffic traveling along International Boulevard, the driver accelerates rapidly from the left turn lane into the bus-only lane across the intersection, then continues traveling in the bus-only lane accelerating past congested traffic.
Image: Black SUV seen performing a queue jump from a left turn lane, accelerating through the crosswalk at an active bus platform around an (also speeding) pickup truck.
Above: International Blvd at 38th Avenue with arrows demonstrating illegal queue jump maneuver from left turn lane to bus-only lane. See Appendix B for example video footage of left turn lane used to jump queue at 38th Avenue.
Proposed Design Treatment:
Drivers frequently use bus only lanes for illegal left turns and u-turns. This behavior commonly occurs squarely within pedestrian crosswalks as drivers try to avoid hardened centerlines adjacent to the turn lanes. This behavior especially endangers people walking in the crosswalk to access bus boarding platforms.
Image: Vehicle utilizes bus only lane to perform illegal u-turn at 55th and International.
Proposed Design Treatment:
Above: Example maneuver observed at 47th and International. Drivers combine bus lane with center line dividers to make illegal u-turns that involve run-throughs of multiple active crosswalks around stations. See Appendix C: Videos of illegal u-turns on International.
Above: Example maneuver observed at 19th and International. Drivers here likely become frustrated with inability to make left turns when headed NW on International for multiple blocks and take this opportunity to make an illegal left turn using the bus lanes as buffers for turning into oncoming traffic. Instead of a safe left turn where they only cross 2 crosswalks, this maneuver is far more dangerous, requires speeding into oncoming traffic, and results in the vehicle being maneuvered (more dangerously) through 4 crosswalks (twice as many as a controlled turn).
Drivers are frequently turning left from cross streets onto International Blvd. and are, whether intentionally or unintentionally, turning into the bus-only lane instead of the travel lane. While this behavior in itself may not be exceptionally dangerous, it may reinforce other more dangerous behaviors where drivers use the bus-only lanes to speed and pass queued car traffic.
Image: Confused driver turning north and west left onto International northbound into the bus only lane instead of the legal lane for personal vehicles.
Above: Example diagram at International Blvd. and 50th Avenue, showing a left turn into the bus only lane, instead of the outside travel lane.
Proposed treatments:
Drivers commonly use the bus-only lane as a left turn lane causing congestion and bus performance issues. Because these locations are not intended for left turns, drivers must speed recklessly as they turn to avoid colliding with ongoing traffic. This endangers oncoming drivers as well as people riding bicycles along International Blvd. or walking in a crosswalk along International Blvd.
Image: A minivan with no plates makes an illegal left in front of a marked no-left-or-u-turn sign at 20th and International. Full video in appendix.
Image: A vehicle waits in the bus lane at 64th to perform a left turn into a shopping center on the south side of International Boulevard.
Above: Examples of illegal left turns from bus-only lanes observed at 64th Avenue and International Blvd. See appendix D for videos of drivers using bus-only lanes for left turns
Proposed treatments:
Based on our research, we observed certain “hot spots” that would benefit from one or more of the above treatments described. They are listed below, in no order of primacy:
We believe the following interventions would be valuable along the entire corridor.
Speed bumps before TEMPO stations
Add speed tables or speed bumps before TEMPO bus platforms. This will slow down vehicles speeding along the bus lanes without impacting bus performance near where pedestrian crossings to access platforms are.
Above: Example configuration of speed bumps at approach to bus stations. Intersection shown is at 50th and International.
Gated intersections at bus lane entrances
Gate intersections with vertical paint (e.g. flex posts) to make it clear the bus is only allowed in the bus only lane (e.g. when it’s unclear for drivers making a left turn onto International) and to create visual constraints to slow down drivers cutting the queue at intersections via misuse of the left turn lane and the bus only lane.
Above: Example interventions to more clearly physically delineate entrance to bus only lane.
Better protected crosswalks at stations
Use cones, flexposts, or poured concrete to better protect pedestrian crossings at stations and pinch access into the bus lane to reduce the ability for vehicles to utilize it at high speeds as part of a queue jump at an intersection.
Above: Example of where raised concrete could be added to reduce the amount of open pavement that is available to vehicles speeding and queue jumping.
Better demarcated bus lanes
Clearly mark the bus only lane. There are many sections where it is unclear even to well-meaning drivers that this is a bus lane. Paint it red, add small physical separators like curb stops arranged linearly to create a buffer.
The following images demonstrate what typical international gold-standard BRT systems utilize, at a minimum, to physically separate their BRT right-of-ways from other freeflow traffic from around the world.
Above: Example of a system of small mountable plastic curb stops in use in Mexico City for their BRT system.
Above: Example of a system of slightly taller concrete curb stops mounted linearly in use in Bogota, Colombia for their BRT system.
Above: Example of a system of more tightly-intervalled concrete curb stops in use in Jakarta, Indonesia for their BRT system.
Raw repository of images related to Traffic Violence Rapid Response research along International is held in this Google Photo album.
Traffic Violence Rapid Response / Oakland CA
[1] Vertical Speed Control Elements - Speed Cushions, Urban Street Design Guide, National Association of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/street-design-elements/vertical-speed-control-elements/speed-cushion/
[2] separation Elements, Transit Street Design Guide, National Associaton of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/transit-street-design-guide/transit-lanes-transitways/lane-elements/separation-elements/
[3] Ibid.
[4] Build toolkit, Don’t Give Up at the Intersection, National Association of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/dont-give-up-at-the-intersection/build-toolkit/
[5] Pavement Markings & Color, Transit Street Design Guide, National Association of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/transit-street-design-guide/transit-lanes-transitways/lane-elements/pavement-markings-color/
[6] Vertical Speed Control Elements - Speed Cushions, Urban Street Design Guide, National Association of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/street-design-elements/vertical-speed-control-elements/speed-cushion/
[7] separation Elements, Transit Street Design Guide, National Associaton of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/transit-street-design-guide/transit-lanes-transitways/lane-elements/separation-elements/
[8] Vertical Speed Control Elements - Speed Cushions, Urban Street Design Guide, National Association of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/street-design-elements/vertical-speed-control-elements/speed-cushion/
[9] Build toolkit, Don’t Give Up at the Intersection, National Association of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/dont-give-up-at-the-intersection/build-toolkit/
[10] Pavement Markings & Color, Transit Street Design Guide, National Association of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/transit-street-design-guide/transit-lanes-transitways/lane-elements/pavement-markings-color/
[11] separation Elements, Transit Street Design Guide, National Associaton of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/transit-street-design-guide/transit-lanes-transitways/lane-elements/separation-elements/
[12] Ibid.
[13] Separation Elements, Transit Street Design Guide, National Associaton of City Transportation Officials: https://nacto.org/publication/transit-street-design-guide/transit-lanes-transitways/lane-elements/separation-elements/
[14] Ibid.