Proposal Evaluation Rubric
Category | 3 - Meets expectations | 2 - Approaches expectations | 1 - Does not meet expectations |
Student Impact | The project directly impacts a specific group of students in Philadelphia. The project goes above and beyond daily instruction, in order to create a meaningful learning experience for students. Any additional funds will be utilized for classroom supplies. | The project directly impacts students in Philadelphia. The project offers a hands-on learning experience for students, but one which may be less meaningful or may be similar to daily instruction. | The project does not serve students in Philadelphia, and/or does not offer a hands-on experience for students. It is unclear how funds will affect students. |
Timeliness | The project will be implemented and/or completed before the next PhilaSoup dinner. The project has a specific, realistic timeline. | The project has a vague timeline, and/or may take place after the next PhilaSoup event. | The project has no set timeline and/or no immediate plan for implementation. |
Funding | The project has a clear and realistic budget. The project will be able to be implemented solely with the PhilaSoup grant, or with the use of additional specific funding. | The project may have a vague or somewhat unrealistic budget. The project may not be able to be implemented with only the PhilaSoup grant, but fails to identify additional funding. | The project has no budget and/or cannot be accomplished with the funds provided by a PhilaSoup grant. |
Innovation | The project goes beyond daily instruction in order to create an authentic learning experience for students that they would not experience otherwise. The project has real-world connections or is inquiry-based. The presenter expresses passion for the project and can explain at length why it is valuable for his or her students. | The project may create a learning experience that goes beyond daily instruction. The project has some real-world connection. The presenter is vague in why he or she is proposing the project. | The project does not go beyond normal instruction, and/or has no real-world connection or inquiry stance. The presenter does not express passion for the project. |