Khalil Rushdan sits in a cafe in Phoenix on March 4. Rushdan served 15 years of his 25-year sentence for first-degree felony murder and was exonerated on he grounds of prosecutorial vindictiveness in 2011. Lauren Renteria/Arizona-Sonora News Service
In the fall of 2011, Khalil Rushdan walked out of prison a free man.
Rushdan served 15 years of a 25-year sentence following his conviction for first-degree felony murder in 1997. That year, Rushdan wasn’t alone when he became a free man.
He was one of the 74 people exonerated in the U.S., according to the National Registry for Exonerations.
His story, like so many others, is complex.
In 1993, Rushdan worked as a middleman for drug dealers and sellers in Tucson. What started out as a regular deal between quickly turned to violence.
Rushdan had left the buyers and seller alone for the transaction and when he returned, one of the buyers had shot and killed the seller.
“I come back to the house to lock up and make sure that nothing was left behind, to clean up,” Rushdan said, now 38. “And, I see them carrying the guy out. It was shocking on a lot of levels because you hear about it but you never think it can happen to you. You know people, or you think you know people.”
Rushdan fled and it took months for the police to catch up to him, but once the killer went on trial, he agreed to testify as a witness for the prosecution. But, when Rushdan and his family where met with death threats from the killer’s associates, he refused to testify. The killer was acquitted.
After the trial, Rushdan was arrested in Ohio—he had an outstanding warrant for his arrest in Pima County for felony murder. According to Arizona law, an individual can be prosecuted for murder even if he or she is only indirectly involved.
In Rushdan’s case, he had set up the meeting between the two parties, making him legally responsible for the murder. Rushdan was only put on trial after the killer was acquitted and after he refused to testify for the prosecution.
Convicted and sentenced to 25 years in prison, Rushdan never thought about bringing his case to the Arizona Justice Project until another inmate convinced him to do so. The project worked to free Rushdan on the grounds of prosecutorial vindictiveness—the project argued that the prosecution targeted Rushdan after he used his legal right to refuse to testify.
Since the late 1900s, attorneys across the country began to form local organizations dedicated to freeing the innocent and wrongly imprisoned. In 1998, Larry Hammond, an Arizona defense attorney, started the Arizona Justice Project and it became only the fifth of its kind in the country. Today, there are over 60 similar organizations across the country.
The project started out as a group of attorneys hoping to make a difference in the criminal justice system. Over the years, it’s become one of the main offices that handles cases like Rushdan’s, according to Lindsay Herf, the executive director of the project’s management team.
Rushdan is only one of the 21 other individuals exonerated with help from the project since 1998 and one of 1,020 exonerees since 1989 who were released due to official misconduct, according to the National Registry for Exonerations.
The project doesn’t only work with cases that involve official misconduct, but also with those that involve a claim of innocence. Since 1998, the office has received around 5,000 requests for assistance.
“Most are low-income people, which is probably the majority of people that go through the justice system,” Herf said. “People who do not have the resources or funding to get experts and hire other attorneys or that type of thing.”
Right now, the team has 35 cases with three in court and another three in parole hearings. Investigating each case is no easy task. One of the first tasks for the office is working with experts to see if there is enough evidence to go through with the appeals process.
“Cases 10 years ago, that we didn’t think we could do much with, we are now reexamining,” she said.
Much of the work that Herf and her colleagues do is investigating the cases to see if there is additional witness testimony and physical evidence like DNA.
The exoneration rate has increasing rapidly over the past decade. In 2001 only 90 individuals were exonerated. In 2016, 160 people found their freedom, the highest year on record.
With a steady increase in exonerations, prosecution offices are starting to look at local claims of innocence and wrongful imprisonment with organized conviction integrity units. Employees are tasked with investigating claims and working with local experts to uncover any new evidence.
Since 2011, these units have increased by almost five times. Now there are 29 established CIUs across the country and a record 70 exonerations took place because of CIU involvement, according to the National Registry of Exonerations.
Rick Unklesbay, the chief trial counsel for the Pima County Attorney, said his office and other prosecution offices across the country have been doing this kind of work for years only without a designated CIU.
Unklesbay has been with the office since 1981 but retired in 2010. In 2014, Unklesbay decided to take on a part-time position as the leader, founder and sole member of Arizona’s only CIU that works closely with the Arizona Justice Project.
“I got intrigued with the idea and talked to [the Pima County Attorney] about it and we thought ‘yeah we should put this in a unit in the office,’” Unklesbay said.
Before Unklesbay started the unit, there wasn’t an organized place to have claims investigated. But, since the office opened, Unklesbay said only 50 cases have been filed to the office for review which is why the unit is a one-man-show.
“It hasn’t been the avalanche of cases that I expected to come in,” he said.
Unklesbay said he thinks the reason these units are only now popping up is the attitude some prosecution offices have toward investigating claims of innocence and wrongful imprisonment.
Unklesbay said some offices might think that it isn’t the prosecution’s job to investigate these claims or since they already do, there is no need for an actual unit.
“I think the advantage of having a unit is that there’s some specific place it goes to and there’s a person who’s tasked with looking at these cases as opposed to randomly assigning them to somebody in the office,” Unklesbay said.
In the end, Unklesbay said he thinks the burden does rest on the prosecution to investigate all of these claims.
“We started not because we felt that there were big problems but if there are problems,” Unklesbay said. “We want to make sure we correct those problems.”
For Rushdan and others like him, organizations like the Arizona Justice Project and prosecution offices with CIUs give the wrongfully imprisoned a second chance. It’s been five years since his release and he has turned his life around.
Rushdan is an artist. He designs T-shirts to promote reentry awareness. He said he hopes to sell the desert-themed shirts to help fund his own art and reentry programs.He also works as a mentor and counselor for individuals reentering society.
After prison, Rushdan said getting back into society didn’t come easy. He was lost when it came to finding a job, technology and getting used to the future he was thrust into. He said he does the work he does now because he doesn’t want others to go through the hardship he went through coming back from prison.
“I’ll be happy knowing that I gave people effective programming and people can immediately start seeing the change,” he said.
Lauren Renteria is a reporter for the Arizona Sonora News, a service from the School of Journalism with the University of Arizona. Contact her at email@example.com
Click here for a link with high-resolution photos.