Table of summary
Journal | Authors | Assessment tool | Psychometrics | Domain | Subjects |
Age & Ageing | Blake et al. (2002) | the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Sheffield Screening Test for Acquired Language Disorders, and Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices | Sensitivity Specificity | Cognition | stroke |
Brain Injury | Chan et al. (2002) | Cognistat (Chinese version) | Sensitivity Specificity Factor structure | Cognitive screening: 3 general areas (level of consciousness, orientation, attention span) 5 major ability areas (language, constructional ability, memory, calculation skills and reasoning/judgment) | 53 (stroke) and 34 (healthy) |
Brain Injury | Chen et al. (2009) | Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT) Digit Vigilance Test (DVT) | Test-retest reliability | Attention | 39 (stroke)¸ two administered in one week interval |
Brain Injury | Man et al. (2006) | Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE or Cognistat) | Two factors obtained: verbal-spatial and integrated cognition | Cognitive screening | 148 (stroke) |
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation | Cartoni et al. (2005) | Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State (MEAMS) | Sensitivity Specificity | Cognitive screening assessment (perception, memory, executive function and language) | 30 (stroke) |
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation | Erez et al. (2009) | computerized programme for the assessment of visual spatial attention (VISSTA) vs. paper and pencil tests | diagnostic sensitivity | Visual spatial attention | 72 (stroke with unilateral spatial neglect) and 39 (healthy control) |
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy | Cooke et al. (2006) | the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST) | Construct validity Ecological validity | Visual perception | 208 (stroke) and 356 (healthy control) |
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy | Cooke et al. (2006) | the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST) | Concurrent criterion validity Sensitivity specificity | Visual perception | 208 (stroke) |
Applied Neuropsychology | Greve et al. (2000) | The Hooper Visual Organization Test (HVOT | Construct validity | Visual perceptual function | 101 (stroke) |
Applied Neuropsychology | South et al. (2001) | Clock Drawing Test (CDT) | Interrater reliability Intrarater consistency | Cognitive screening tool | 20 (stroke) |
American Journal of Occupational Therapy | Hartman-Maeir et al. (2009) | Kettle test | Interrater reliability validity | Cognitive functional performance | 21 (stroke) and 4 (OT) for reliability 36 (stroke) and 36 (healthy control) for validity |
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation | Johnson-Greene et al. (2009) | The Three Cities Test (TCT) | Correlated with MMSE and HVLT-R | Screening test for memory | 60 (stroke) and 55 (orthopedic) |
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation | Ku et al. (2009) | virtual environment technology (VET)-based cognitive assessment | Test-retest reliability validity | Cognition assessment | 20 (stroke) |
Neuropsychologia | Lee et al. (2004) | The Character-line Bisection Task (CLBT) | Sensitivity Reliability Validity | Neglect | 80 (stroke) and 91 (control) |
Clinical Neuropsychologist | Chan et al. (2008) | Letter-Number (LN) Span Test (Chinese version) | Construct validity Discriminative validity | Executive function and working memory | 165 (healthy) and stroke |
Clinical Neuropsychologist | Messinis et al. (2009) | Benton Visual Retention Test performance | Test-retest reliability Discriminate validity | Visual retention | 352 (healthy adults) and 28 (stroke) |
Clinical Neuropsychologist | Su et al. (2008) | the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 (WCST-64) | Factor structure Contrasted-group validity | Executive function | 112 (stroke) |
Clinical Rehabilitation | Nokleby et al. (2008) | Cognistat, the Screening Instrument for Neuropsychological impairments in Stroke (SIGNS) and Clock Drawing Test | Concurrent validity Sensitivity | Cognition | 49 (stroke) |
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society | Nadolne et al. (2001) | Environment-specific criterion measures of wayfinding | Ecologic validity Internal consistency | Wayfinding | 31 (stroke) |
Disability & Rehabilitation | Roding et al. (2009) | Self-reported (questionnaire) for physical and cognitive functions | Descriptive data | Cognition functions | 1068 (stroke) |
Disability & Rehabilitation | Royle et al. (2008) | The Everyday Memory Questionnaire (EMQ) | Factor structure Internal consistency Criterion validity Face validity | Memory | Not mention in the abstract. |
Disability & Rehabilitation | te Winkel-Witlox et al. (2008) | CAMCOG, Rotterdam-CAMCOG (R-CAMCOG), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the cognitive part of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM cognition) | Criterion validity | Cognition | 169 (stroke) |
Experimental Neuropsychology: Official Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society | Spencer et al. (2009) | The Cognitive Estimation Test (CET) | Reliability Divergent validity | Executive function | 112 (neurological impairments) |
Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery | van Heugten et al (2007) | checklist (CLCE-24) | Internal consistency | Cognition and emotion | 69 (stroke) |
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research | Yip et al. (2009) | computerized cognitive assessment system (CCAS) | Concurrent validity Content validity | Cognition functions | 14 (stroke) |